These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36733190)

  • 21. Modeling bout-pause response patterns in variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules using hierarchical Bayesian methodology.
    Matsui H; Yamada K; Sakagami T; Tanno T
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():346-353. PubMed ID: 30059765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An experimental analysis of steady-state response rate components on variable ratio and variable interval schedules of reinforcement.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20718555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A parametric description of amphetamine's effect on response rate: changes in reinforcement efficacy and response topography.
    Heyman GM; Seiden LS
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 85(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 3925482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Theory of reinforcement schedules.
    Killeen PR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Nov; 120(3):289-319. PubMed ID: 37706228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. More on concurrent interval-ratio schedules: a replication and review.
    Heyman GM; Herrnstein RJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Nov; 46(3):331-51. PubMed ID: 3805975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors controlling the micro-structure of human free-operant behaviour: Bout-initiation and within-bout responses are effected by different aspects of the schedule.
    Chen X; Reed P
    Behav Processes; 2020 Jun; 175():104106. PubMed ID: 32209336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement.
    Alvarez-Sekely CS; Toscano-Zapien AL; Salles-Ize P; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Lopez-Guzman MA; Velazquez-Martinez DN
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104822. PubMed ID: 36669746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Behavioral momentum: the effects of the temporal separation of rates of reinforcement.
    Cohen SL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 9465412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relative and absolute reinforcement frequency as determinants of choice in concurrent variable interval schedules.
    Shah K; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1991 Feb; 43(1):25-38. PubMed ID: 2017573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reinforcer quality matters: A test of the Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement with domestic hens (Gallus gallus domesticus).
    Bruce JM; Jackson SMK; Bizo LA; McEwan JAS; Foster TM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jul; 112(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 31250443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Schedules of reinforcement as determinants of human causality judgments and response rates.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jul; 27(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 11497319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neural basis of operant behaviors maintained on the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) schedule in rodents.
    Liao RM; Pattij T
    Brain Res Bull; 2022 Jul; 185():1-17. PubMed ID: 35439572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Repeated, within-session resurgence.
    Cook JE; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):28-47. PubMed ID: 30656711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Covariance, feedback, and discounting in ratio schedules.
    Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Mar; 117(2):123-150. PubMed ID: 35080022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are positive and negative reinforcement "different"? Insights from a free-operant differential outcomes effect.
    Magoon MA; Critchfield TS; Merrill D; Newland MC; Schneider WJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):39-64. PubMed ID: 28101928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Habituation and the reinforcing effectiveness of visual stimuli.
    Lloyd DR; Gancarz AM; Ashrafioun L; Kausch MA; Richards JB
    Behav Processes; 2012 Oct; 91(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 22868172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Human performance on random interval schedules.
    Reed P; Smale D; Owens D; Freegard G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(3):309-321. PubMed ID: 29985046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Resistance to change and frequency of response-dependent stimuli uncorrelated with reinforcement.
    Podlesnik CA; Jimenez-Gomez C; Ward RD; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):199-214. PubMed ID: 20354599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A laboratory comparison of two variations of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate procedures.
    Jessel J; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):314-24. PubMed ID: 24740374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.