138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36733352)
1. Efficacy of modified thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis versus traditional thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis for esophageal cancer: Propensity score-matched analysis.
Hong Z; Gou W; Lu Y; Wu X; Sheng Y; Cui B; Bai X; Jin D; Gou Y
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1076014. PubMed ID: 36733352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Hong Z; Cui B; Wang K; Bai X; Yang N; Zhang Y; Wu X; Cheng T; Jin D; Zhao J; Gou Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 30(13):8271-8277. PubMed ID: 37698668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Corrigendum: Efficacy of modified thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis versus traditional thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis for esophageal cancer: propensity score-matched analysis.
Hong Z; Gou W; Lu Y; Wu X; Sheng Y; Cui B; Bai X; Jin D; Gou Y
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1216836. PubMed ID: 37388226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and Quality of Life with the Modified Versus the Traditional Thoraco-Laparoscopic McKeown Procedure for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Hong Z; Cui B; Lu Y; Bai X; Yang N; He X; Wu X; Cheng T; Jin D; Zhao J; Gou Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 30(13):8223-8230. PubMed ID: 37535270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagostomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Compared with open approach.
Zhang Z; Xu M; Guo M; Liu X
Int J Surg; 2017 Sep; 45():98-104. PubMed ID: 28778695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy for T2 middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Wang J; Wei N; Lu Y; Zhang X; Jiang N
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 16(1):58. PubMed ID: 29548327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Yang X; Zhan C; Sun F; Chen L; Shi M; Jiang W; Wang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):979-984. PubMed ID: 27680063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thoracoscopic-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis surgery vs. McKeown surgery in the treatment of thoracic middle-lower segment esophageal cancer.
Shi Y; Wang A; Yu S; Fei X; Liu S; Liao J
J BUON; 2021; 26(3):1062-1069. PubMed ID: 34268973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative analysis on the classic and modified Ivor-Lewis procedure in the treatment of mid-low thoracic esophageal carcinoma].
Zhen FX; Luo JH; Zhang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1180-2. PubMed ID: 24369401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study.
Wang J; Wei N; Jiang N; Lu Y; Zhang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(6):e14416. PubMed ID: 30732195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.
Li B; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Li H; Zhang J; Sun Y; Hu H; Miao L; Ma L; Luo X; Chen S; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Chen H
JAMA Surg; 2015 Apr; 150(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 25650816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of operative approaches on outcomes of middle and lower third esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
J Thorac Dis; 2016 Dec; 8(12):3588-3595. PubMed ID: 28149553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Single Intercostal Space Thoracoscopic Approach for Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Pan S; Wang L; Wu M; Wang Q; Shen G; Chen G
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 28504587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Use of gastric tube in construction technique thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy].
Rong B; Guo M; Wu X
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):876-879. PubMed ID: 28836245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Lin D; Ye T; Ma L; Shao L; Song Z; Jiang S; Xiang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):990-994. PubMed ID: 27680065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of jejunostomy for enteral nutrition during complete thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in thoracic segment esophageal carcinoma.
Tian J; Mei X; Guo M; Xiong R; Sun X
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):142. PubMed ID: 32552786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and Sweet esophagectomy for the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Feng Y; Wu N; Yan S; Wang X; Yang Y
J Thorac Dis; 2019 Aug; 11(8):3584-3592. PubMed ID: 31559065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semiprone thoracoscopic approach during totally minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy seems to be beneficial.
Froiio C; Uzun E; Hadzijusufovic E; Capovilla G; Berlth F; Lang H; Grimminger PP
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jan; 36(2):. PubMed ID: 35780319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
