These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36733923)

  • 1. Spatial rehabilitation using virtual auditory space training paradigm in individuals with sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Nisha KV; Uppunda AK; Kumar RT
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1080398. PubMed ID: 36733923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual Auditory Space Training-Induced Changes of Auditory Spatial Processing in Listeners with Normal Hearing.
    Nisha KV; Kumar AU
    J Int Adv Otol; 2017 Apr; 13(1):118-127. PubMed ID: 28555603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Maturation and Chronological Aging on Auditory Spatial Processing: A Cross-Sectional Study Across Life Span.
    Nisha KV; Uppunda AK; Konadath S
    Am J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 32(1):119-134. PubMed ID: 36548963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Spatial Training Paradigms on Auditory Spatial Refinement in Normal-Hearing Listeners: A Comparative Study.
    Nisha KV; Kumar AU
    J Audiol Otol; 2022 Jul; 26(3):113-121. PubMed ID: 35196448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pre-Attentive Neural Signatures of Auditory Spatial Processing in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Impairment: A Comparative Study.
    Nisha KV; Kumar UA
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 28(2S):437-449. PubMed ID: 31461328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Musical Training and Its Association With Age-Related Changes in Binaural, Temporal, and Spatial Processing.
    Nisha KV; Durai R; Konadath S
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 31(3):669-683. PubMed ID: 35772171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Abacus Training on Auditory Spatial Maturation in Children with Normal Hearing.
    Sanjana M; Nisha KV
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jan; 27(1):e56-e66. PubMed ID: 36714899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Klingel M; Laback B
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Feb; 23(1):119-136. PubMed ID: 34812980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and evaluation of the LiSN & learn auditory training software for deficit-specific remediation of binaural processing deficits in children: preliminary findings.
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(10):678-96. PubMed ID: 22212767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.
    Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 28123078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
    Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Recipients with Normal Hearing in the Contralateral Ear: Effects of Spectral Content and Duration of Listening Experience.
    Dillon MT; Rooth MA; Canfarotta MW; Richter ME; Thompson NJ; Brown KD
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(6):437-448. PubMed ID: 35439753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):101-114. PubMed ID: 34133400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
    Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial Hearing Difficulties in Reaching Space in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children Improve With Head Movements.
    Coudert A; Gaveau V; Gatel J; Verdelet G; Salemme R; Farne A; Pavani F; Truy E
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):192-205. PubMed ID: 34225320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants.
    Loiselle LH; Dorman MF; Yost WA; Cook SJ; Gifford RH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 59(4):810-8. PubMed ID: 27411035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid: Objective Measures of Binaural Benefit.
    Balkenhol T; Wallhäusser-Franke E; Rotter N; Servais JJ
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():586119. PubMed ID: 33381008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.