173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36734424)
1. Fracture strength of implant-supported monolithic crowns after aging in a mastication simulator.
Şalvarlı KC; Talay Çevlik E
Int J Esthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 18(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 36734424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.
Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant.
Rohr N; Brunner S; Märtin S; Fischer J
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):138-145. PubMed ID: 28461047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occlusal Thickness and Cement-Type Effects on Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Posterior Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
Bulut AC; Atsü SS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):485-491. PubMed ID: 34115062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing monolithic crowns prepared in different cement thicknesses.
Sagsoz NP; Yanıkoglu N
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 21(4):417-422. PubMed ID: 29607851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlations between fracture load of zirconia implant supported single crowns and mechanical properties of restorative material and cement.
Rohr N; Märtin S; Fischer J
Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar; 37(2):222-228. PubMed ID: 29176305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the fracture resistance and failure types of different CAD-CAM ceramic crowns supported by angled titanium abutments.
Yüksel M; Saygin AG; Bolayir G
J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):594-601. PubMed ID: 36065985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance of Molar Crowns Fabricated with Monolithic All-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Cemented on Titanium Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
Dogan DO; Gorler O; Mutaf B; Ozcan M; Eyuboglu GB; Ulgey M
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 26(4):309-314. PubMed ID: 26618513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of CAD/CAM Materials for Monolithic Dental Restorations.
Furtado de Mendonca A; Shahmoradi M; Gouvêa CVD; De Souza GM; Ellakwa A
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e587-e594. PubMed ID: 30121945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue.
Aboushelib MN; Elsafi MH
Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture resistance of monolithic translucent zirconia crown bonded with different self-adhesive resin cement: influence of MDP-containing zirconia primer after aging.
Tyor S; Al-Zordk W; Sakrana AA
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Sep; 23(1):636. PubMed ID: 37670286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
Donmez MB; Diken Turksayar AA; Olcay EO; Sahmali SM
J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In-vitro fatigue and fracture testing of CAD/CAM-materials in implant-supported molar crowns.
Preis V; Hahnel S; Behr M; Bein L; Rosentritt M
Dent Mater; 2017 Apr; 33(4):427-433. PubMed ID: 28185678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Vent Hole and Cement Type on Fracture Resistance of CAD-CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.
Talay Çevlik E; Alkan Demetoğlu G; Yıldız P
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):411-416. PubMed ID: 35752941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
