These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36734929)

  • 1. Surface Modifications of Commercial Dental Implant Systems: An Overview.
    Sivaswamy V; Bahl V
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2023; 33(2):71-77. PubMed ID: 36734929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
    Lee JT; Cho SA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of Implant Surface on Maintenance of Marginal Bone Levels for Three Premium Implant Brands: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Norton MR; Åström M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1099-1111. PubMed ID: 33270049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
    Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 14 dental implant surfaces.
    Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Vazquez L; Park YJ; Sammartino G; Bernard JP
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Oct; 37(5):525-42. PubMed ID: 21728785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial.
    Carmo Filho LCD; Marcello-Machado RM; Castilhos ED; Del Bel Cury AA; Faot F
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Oct; 32():e110. PubMed ID: 30379212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study.
    O'Sullivan D; Sennerby L; Meredith N
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 11359268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Influence of Nanostructured Hydroxyapatite Surface in the Early Stages of Osseointegration: A Multiparameter Animal Study in Low-Density Bone.
    Sartoretto SC; Calasans-Maia J; Resende R; Câmara E; Ghiraldini B; Barbosa Bezerra FJ; Granjeiro JM; Calasans-Maia MD
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2020; 15():8803-8817. PubMed ID: 33204089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
    Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants.
    Cochran DL; Buser D; ten Bruggenkate CM; Weingart D; Taylor TM; Bernard JP; Peters F; Simpson JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Apr; 13(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 11952734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Roughness, Wettability, and SEM Features between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants.
    Chhabra K; Rajasekar A
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2024; 34(4):57-63. PubMed ID: 38842233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immediate restoration of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: five-year results of a prospective case series study using clinical and radiographic data.
    Levine RA; Sendi P; Bornstein MM
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Feb; 32(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 22254224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite PREVAIL implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study.
    Ostman PO; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20148916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
    Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
    Gottlow J; Barkarmo S; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e204-12. PubMed ID: 22487460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implant surfaces modified with CO ions: a comparative histomorphometric study in beagle dogs.
    De Maeztu MA; Braceras I; Alava JI; Gay-Escoda C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 37(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 18339518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model.
    Ernst S; Stübinger S; Schüpbach P; Sidler M; Klein K; Ferguson SJ; von Rechenberg B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):898-908. PubMed ID: 24954017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal Bone Loss Around Early-Loaded SLA and SLActive Implants: Radiological Follow-Up Evaluation Up to 6.5 Years.
    Şener-Yamaner ID; Yamaner G; Sertgöz A; Çanakçi CF; Özcan M
    Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):592-599. PubMed ID: 28731897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 5-year prospective multicenter study of early loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface.
    Cochran DL; Jackson JM; Bernard JP; ten Bruggenkate CM; Buser D; Taylor TD; Weingart D; Schoolfield JD; Jones AA; Oates TW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1324-32. PubMed ID: 22167440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.