148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36735424)
1. C-Clamp Technique: A Retrospective Review of a Novel Technique to Prevent Bladder Injury in Retropubic Midurethral Slings.
Jayne CJ; Bach M; Odulate-Williams A; Ocon A; Siddiqui G
Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 Feb; 29(2):128-132. PubMed ID: 36735424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study.
Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Murray C; Schierlitz L; Dykes N; Zilberlicht A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):593.e1-593.e8. PubMed ID: 33316277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two Intraoperative Techniques for Midurethral Sling Tensioning: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Brennand EA; Wu G; Houlihan S; Globerman D; Gagnon LH; Birch C; Hyakutake M; Carlson KV; Al-Shankiti H; Robert M; Lazare D; Kim-Fine S;
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 136(3):471-481. PubMed ID: 32769657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is there an association between polypropylene midurethral slings and malignancy?
King AB; Zampini A; Vasavada S; Moore C; Rackley RR; Goldman HB
Urology; 2014 Oct; 84(4):789-92. PubMed ID: 25260443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-assisted intravesical mesh excision following retropubic midurethral sling.
Olive EJ; Linder BJ
Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Apr; 35(4):921-923. PubMed ID: 38308690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the local carcinogenic potential of mesh used in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
Linder BJ; Trabuco EC; Carranza DA; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1333-6. PubMed ID: 26864666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic retropubic sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery.
Mou T; Cadish LA; Gray EL; Bretschneider CE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep; 227(3):471.e1-471.e7. PubMed ID: 35644248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sling plication for persistent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling.
Swallow CH; Rickey LM; Harmanli O
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Apr; 34(4):957-959. PubMed ID: 36242629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of vaginal mesh exposure after midurethral sling placement: a case-control study.
Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Carranza Leon DA; Trabuco EC
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 26811112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of retropubic synthetic mid-urethral slings to fascia pubovaginal slings following failed sling surgery.
Aberger M; Gomelsky A; Padmanabhan P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Sep; 35(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 26175333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term Risk of Reoperation After Synthetic Mesh Midurethral Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 134(5):1047-1055. PubMed ID: 31599825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sling Plication for Failed Midurethral Sling Procedures: A Case Series.
Maheshwari D; Jones K; Solomon E; Harmanli O
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):e4-e6. PubMed ID: 30180049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Nambiar A; Cody JD; Jeffery ST
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; (6):CD008709. PubMed ID: 24880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reoperation for Urinary Incontinence After Retropubic and Transobturator Sling Procedures.
Trabuco EC; Carranza D; El Nashar SA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Elliott DS; Linder BJ; Occhino J; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):333-342. PubMed ID: 31306327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Midurethral Fascial "Sling on a String": An Alternative to Midurethral Synthetic Tapes in the Era of Mesh Complications.
Osman NI; Hillary CJ; Mangera A; Aldamanhoori R; Inman RD; Chapple CR
Eur Urol; 2018 Aug; 74(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 29803585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Midurethral slings for women with stress urinary incontinence: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(3):1-61. PubMed ID: 23074494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reoperation for urinary incontinence: a nationwide cohort study, 1998-2007.
Foss Hansen M; Lose G; Kesmodel US; Gradel KO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):263.e1-263.e8. PubMed ID: 26344752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Outcomes Between the Top-down Versus the Bottom-up Approach for Retropubic Midurethral Sling.
Mehrotra V; Pearl J; Sheyn D; Wherley SD
Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Apr; 35(4):849-854. PubMed ID: 38376548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incontinence rates after midurethral sling revision for vaginal exposure or pain.
Jambusaria LH; Heft J; Reynolds WS; Dmochowski R; Biller DH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):764.e1-764.e5. PubMed ID: 27448731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Synthetic Midurethral Slings: Roles, Outcomes, and Complications.
Linder BJ; Elliott DS
Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 30466699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
