BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36735539)

  • 1. Complementary Effect of the Proportion of Overspeed Frames of Withdrawal and Withdrawal Time on Reflecting Colonoscopy Quality: A Retrospective, Observational Study.
    Gong R; Yao L; Zhang L; Li X; Zhang J; Li J; Jiang X; Zhao Y; Wang J; Zhang C; Wu H; Lu Z; Chen M; Yu H
    Clin Transl Gastroenterol; 2023 Mar; 14(3):e00566. PubMed ID: 36735539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-step validation of a deep learning-based system for the quantification of bowel preparation: a prospective, observational study.
    Zhou W; Yao L; Wu H; Zheng B; Hu S; Zhang L; Li X; He C; Wang Z; Li Y; Huang C; Guo M; Zhang X; Zhu Q; Wu L; Deng Y; Zhang J; Tan W; Li C; Zhang C; Gong R; Du H; Zhou J; Sharma P; Yu H
    Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Nov; 3(11):e697-e706. PubMed ID: 34538736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
    Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
    Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
    Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
    S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving trainee colonoscopy performance by investigating the withdrawal time from individual colonic segments: a single-center observational study.
    Huang Y; Chen F; Xu G; Huang L; Wan R; Yang L; Chen C
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Aug; 10(8):8607-8616. PubMed ID: 34328014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Changeover to Newer Endoscopic Systems on Quality and Efficiency of Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Equipment or Endoscopist.
    Singh M; Sacatos M; Laine L
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2018; 52(10):891-895. PubMed ID: 28906425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England.
    Lee TJ; Blanks RG; Rees CJ; Wright KC; Nickerson C; Moss SM; Chilton A; Goddard AF; Patnick J; McNally RJ; Rutter MD
    Endoscopy; 2013; 45(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 23254403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Withdrawal time of 8 minutes is associated with higher adenoma detection rates in surveillance colonoscopy after surgery for colorectal cancer.
    Jung DH; Lee JI; Huh CW; Kim MJ; Youn YH; Choi YH; Kim BW
    Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2354-2361. PubMed ID: 32440929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.
    van Toledo DEFWM; IJspeert JEG; Bossuyt PMM; Bleijenberg AGC; van Leerdam ME; van der Vlugt M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Aug; 7(8):747-754. PubMed ID: 35550250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy as a quality indicator of colonoscopy.
    Park SK; Kim HY; Lee CK; Cha JM; Eun CS; Han DS; Lee BI; Shin JE; Park DI
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul; 51(7):886-90. PubMed ID: 27001284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.
    Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial.
    Repici A; Badalamenti M; Maselli R; Correale L; Radaelli F; Rondonotti E; Ferrara E; Spadaccini M; Alkandari A; Fugazza A; Anderloni A; Galtieri PA; Pellegatta G; Carrara S; Di Leo M; Craviotto V; Lamonaca L; Lorenzetti R; Andrealli A; Antonelli G; Wallace M; Sharma P; Rosch T; Hassan C
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Aug; 159(2):512-520.e7. PubMed ID: 32371116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective cohort study of the relationship between the withdrawal time and the detection rate of colorectal adenoma.
    Zhao M; Xu Y; Zhu H; Chen J; Sun W; Yang D; Peng H
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 57(9):1131-1137. PubMed ID: 35465795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
    Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 9-Minute Withdrawal Time Improves Adenoma Detection Rate Compared With 6-Minute Withdrawal Time During Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Aziz M; Haghbin H; Gangwani MK; Nawras M; Nawras Y; Dahiya DS; Sohail AH; Lee-Smith W; Kamal F; Shaukat A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Oct; 57(9):863-870. PubMed ID: 37389958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual feedback and monitoring of endoscopist performance improves the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a prospective case-control study.
    Ishibashi F; Fukushima K; Kobayashi K; Kawakami T; Tanaka R; Kato J; Sato A; Konda K; Sugihara K; Baba S
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2566-2575. PubMed ID: 32468263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of adenoma detection and discrimination during colonoscopy in routine practice: an exploratory study.
    Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Piette C; Bretagne JF; Perrin P
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Dec; 74(6):1325-36. PubMed ID: 21958899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.