These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36736529)
1. Dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: A randomized clinical study comparing the flapless versus the conventional approach. Bhalerao A; Marimuthu M; Wahab A; Ayoub A J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104436. PubMed ID: 36736529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flapless placement of zygomatic implants using dynamic navigation: an innovative technical note. Bhalerao A; Marimuthu M; Wahab A; Ayoub A Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 61(2):136-140. PubMed ID: 36658061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Accuracy and clinical outcome of a real-time surgical navigation system for the placement of quad zygomatic implants]. Tao BX; Wang F; Shen YH; Fan SQ; Huang W; Wang YP; Wu YQ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):845-850. PubMed ID: 33171557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants. González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation and Free Hand Methods During Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Penmetsa GS; Shah RM; Raju MAKV; Gadde P; Alluri Venkata R J Oral Implantol; 2024 Oct; 50(5):468-473. PubMed ID: 39015953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Clinical Evaluation of the Dynamically Navigated Flapless Placement of Zygomatic Implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Bhalerao A; Marimuthu M; Wahab A; Ayoub A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 39(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 37910837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery. Tao B; Shen Y; Sun Y; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 22(6):747-755. PubMed ID: 33112508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally Invasive Navigation-Guided Quad Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Fan S; Gielisch MW; Díaz L; Thiem DGE; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):367-373. PubMed ID: 37083908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimal invasiveness at dental implant placement: A systematic review with meta-analyses on flapless fully guided surgery. Romandini M; Ruales-Carrera E; Sadilina S; Hämmerle CHF; Sanz M Periodontol 2000; 2023 Feb; 91(1):89-112. PubMed ID: 35906928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study. Feng Y; Yao Y; Yang X J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35000696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic navigation: a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement. Pellegrino G; Taraschi V; Andrea Z; Ferri A; Marchetti C Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(2):139-147. PubMed ID: 31134220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel guided zygomatic implant surgery system compared to free hand: A human cadaver study on accuracy. Grecchi E; Stefanelli LV; Grecchi F; Grivetto F; Franchina A; Pranno N J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():103942. PubMed ID: 34974136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery: A cadaver study. Chen Z; Li J; Sinjab K; Mendonca G; Yu H; Wang HL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1186-1194. PubMed ID: 30346631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study. Fan S; Hung K; Bornstein MM; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):85–90. PubMed ID: 30521651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series. Wang J; Ge Y; Mühlemann S; Pan S; Jung RE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1278-1288. PubMed ID: 37642206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study. Shusterman A; Nashef R; Tecco S; Mangano C; Lerner H; Mangano FG J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105052. PubMed ID: 38734298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]