158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36737356)
1. Biomechanical behavior analysis of four types of short implants with different placement depths using the finite element method.
Li R; Wu Z; Chen S; Li X; Wan Q; Xie G; Pei X
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):447.e1-447.e10. PubMed ID: 36737356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parafunctional loading and occlusal device on stress distribution around implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
Borges Radaelli MT; Idogava HT; Spazzin AO; Noritomi PY; Boscato N
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):565-572. PubMed ID: 29724560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the effect of subcrestal placement on platform switched short dental implants and von mises stress in D3 bone-A 3D FEM study.
Reddy MS; Rajasekar S; Eid Abdelmagyd HA
Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 May; 24(5):660-666. PubMed ID: 34018974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical influence of narrow-diameter implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal level in the maxillary anterior region. A 3D finite element analysis.
Cruz RS; Fernandes E Oliveira HF; Lemos CAA; de Souza Batista VE; Capalbo da Silva R; Verri FR
J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 36799260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of diameter, length and elastic modulus of a dental implant on stress and strain levels in peri-implant bone: A 3D finite element analysis.
Robau-Porrua A; Pérez-Rodríguez Y; Soris-Rodríguez LM; Pérez-Acosta O; González JE
Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 30(5-6):541-558. PubMed ID: 31903978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of different abutment diameter of implants on the peri-implant stress in the crestal bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis--In vitro study.
Aradya A; Kumar UK; Chowdhary R
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 27054866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.
Himmlová L; Dostálová T; Kácovský A; Konvicková S
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jan; 91(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 14739889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of placement depth of platform-switched implants on periimplant cortical bone stress: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Rismanchian M; Askari N; Shafiei S
Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 23416848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of platform switching on peri-implant bone: A 3D finite element analysis.
Aslam A; Hassan SH; Aslam HM; Khan DA
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):935-940. PubMed ID: 30711297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution around Various Threaded Implants with and without Platform Switch: A 3-D Finite Element Analysis.
Tomar GK; Garhnayak M; Mahapatra A; Das SS; Mohapatra A; Choudhury GK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):891-896. PubMed ID: 33568611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
