These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36737356)

  • 21. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model With Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis.
    Yazicioglu D; Bayram B; Oguz Y; Cinar D; Uckan S
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 26867093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
    Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Different Surgical Techniques in the All-on-4 Treatment Concept: Evaluation of the Stress Distribution Created in Implant and Peripheral Bone with Finite Element Analysis.
    Ciftci S; Ungor C; Suleymanli B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Dec; 38(6):1135-1144. PubMed ID: 38085744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of implant placement depth on bone remodeling on implant-supported single zirconia abutment crown: A 3D finite element study.
    Poovarodom P; Rungsiyakull C; Suriyawanakul J; Li Q; Sasaki K; Yoda N; Rungsiyakull P
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Apr; 67(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 35934782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of Implant Diameter and Bruxism on Biomechanical Performance in Maxillary All-on-4 Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Sezer T; Kilic K; Esim E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):709-721. PubMed ID: 35904827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stress and strain patterns of 1-piece and 2-piece implant systems in bone: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ormianer Z; Ben Amar A; Duda M; Marku-Cohen S; Lewinstein I
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 22223190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanical evaluation of subcrestal dental implants with different bone anchorages.
    Sotto-Maior BS; Lima Cde A; Senna PM; Camargos Gde V; Del Bel Cury AA
    Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():. PubMed ID: 25098822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigating the impact of diameters and thread designs on the Biomechanics of short implants placed in D4 bone: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Alqahtani AR; Desai SR; Patel JR; Alqhtani NR; Alqahtani AS; Heboyan A; Fernandes GVO; Mustafa M; Karobari MI
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Sep; 23(1):686. PubMed ID: 37740190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical evaluation of subcrestal placement of dental implants: in vitro and numerical analyses.
    Chu CM; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Huang HL
    J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):302-10. PubMed ID: 20809863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Investigation of influence of different implant size and placement on stress distribution with 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Balkaya MC
    Implant Dent; 2014 Dec; 23(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 25290280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible.
    Lee H; Park S; Noh G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):659-670. PubMed ID: 30580986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of bone quality and bone loss level around internal and external connection implants: A finite element analysis study.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT; Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):137.e1-137.e10. PubMed ID: 33139058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical evaluation of stress distributions at the implant-abutment complex and peri-implant bone around mandibular dental implants with different neck geometries and inclinations.
    Dinc MM; Turkoglu P; Selvi F
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Sep; 235(9):1035-1045. PubMed ID: 34098780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Influence of thread shapes of custommade root-analogue implants on stress distribution of peri-implant bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Lin CP; Lu SH; Zhu JX; Hu HC; Yue ZG; Tang ZH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Dec; 51(6):1130-1137. PubMed ID: 31848517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis.
    Moreira de Melo EJ; Francischone CE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):477-484. PubMed ID: 31810614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stress Analysis Around Reduced-Diameter Zirconia and Titanium One-Piece Implants With and Without Microthreads in the Neck: Experimental and Finite Element Analysis.
    Al-Zordk W; Ghazy M; El-Anwar M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 32142567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.