These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36737886)

  • 21. Event-Related Potential (ERP) evidence for fluency and disfluency effects on recognition memory.
    Andrew Leynes P; Kalelkar AU; Shaik HT; Sawhney S
    Brain Cogn; 2023 Apr; 167():105961. PubMed ID: 36893675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing.
    Voss JL; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Apr; 48(4):532-46. PubMed ID: 20701709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changes in familiarity and recollection across the lifespan: an ERP perspective.
    Friedman D; de Chastelaine M; Nessler D; Malcolm B
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():124-41. PubMed ID: 19914220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of encoding manipulation on word-stem cued recall: an event-related potential study.
    Fay S; Isingrini M; Ragot R; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):615-26. PubMed ID: 16099370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Separating the FN400 and N400 potentials across recognition memory experiments.
    Stróżak P; Abedzadeh D; Curran T
    Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 1635():41-60. PubMed ID: 26776478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of emotional study context on immediate and delayed recognition memory: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Kuhn LK; Bader R; Mecklinger A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 34498230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the functional significance of retrieval mode: Task switching disrupts the recollection of conceptual stimulus information from episodic memory.
    Küper K
    Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 1678():1-11. PubMed ID: 28986084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of unitization on the contribution of familiarity and recollection processes to associative recognition memory: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zheng Z; Li J; Xiao F; Broster LS; Jiang Y; Xi M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25583573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiple ways to the prior occurrence of an event: an electrophysiological dissociation of experimental and conceptually driven familiarity in recognition memory.
    Wiegand I; Bader R; Mecklinger A
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1360():106-18. PubMed ID: 20816760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is what goes in what comes out? Encoding and retrieval event-related potentials together determine memory outcome.
    Chen YY; Lithgow K; Hemmerich JA; Caplan JB
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 232(10):3175-90. PubMed ID: 24929938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of the congruity of emotional contexts at encoding on source memory: Evidence from ERPs.
    Xie M; Liu Z; Guo C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2022 Mar; 173():45-57. PubMed ID: 34999142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered.
    Yovel G; Paller KA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):789-800. PubMed ID: 14980582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retrieval intention modulates the effects of directed forgetting instructions on recollection.
    Xiao X; Lucas HD; Paller KA; Ding JH; Guo CY
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e104701. PubMed ID: 25140658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials.
    Werkle-Bergner M; Mecklinger A; Kray J; Meyer P; Düzel E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 16099369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Unitization mitigates interference by intrinsic negative emotion in familiarity and recollection of associative memory: Electrophysiological evidence.
    Han M; Mao X; Kartvelishvili N; Li W; Guo C
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1259-1268. PubMed ID: 30225598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Voices to remember: Comparing neural signatures of intentional and non-intentional voice learning and recognition.
    Humble D; Schweinberger SR; Dobel C; Zäske R
    Brain Res; 2019 May; 1711():214-225. PubMed ID: 30685271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preparation breeds success: Brain activity predicts remembering.
    Herron JE; Evans LH
    Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():1-11. PubMed ID: 29860188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Familiarity and recollection in heuristic decision making.
    Schwikert SR; Curran T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Dec; 143(6):2341-65. PubMed ID: 25347534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity.
    Curran T
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(8):1088-106. PubMed ID: 15093148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrophysiological correlates associated with contributions of perceptual and conceptual fluency to familiarity.
    Wang W; Li B; Gao C; Xiao X; Guo C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():321. PubMed ID: 26097450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.