139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36739667)
21. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade intraepithelial lesion and its clinical significance in postmenopausal, pregnant, postpartum, and contraceptive-use patients.
Patton AL; Duncan L; Bloom L; Phaneuf G; Zafar N
Cancer; 2008 Dec; 114(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 18980288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Verification of doubtful PAP smear results of women included in the screening program in the Podlaskie province].
Błońska E; Knapp PA
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):691-5. PubMed ID: 24191502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. P16/Ki-67 Dual Staining in Positive Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing for Predictive Diagnosis of Abnormal Cervical Lesions in Northeastern Thai Women.
Aromseree S; Wongjumpa W; Ekalaksananan T; Temtanakitpaisan A; Kleebkaow P; Srisathaporn S; Tongchai P; Pientong C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Oct; 23(10):3405-3411. PubMed ID: 36308365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Factors associated with abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women].
Fan L; Zou LY; Wu YM; Zhang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 45(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 20420780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical implications of the diagnosis "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" in pregnant women.
Onuma K; Saad RS; Kanbour-Shakir A; Kanbour AI; Dabbs DJ
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):282-7. PubMed ID: 16991139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of endocervical curettage in women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or atypical squamous cells of unknown significance on Pap smear.
Miranda AD; Rodríguez R; Novoa DM; Rojas A; Pachón A; DiazGranados CA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2006 Jul; 10(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 16829753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cervical cytopathological changes in pregnancy: An experience from a low resource setting.
Rasheed FA; Yakasai IA; Takai IU; Yusuf I; Ibrahim UM
Ann Afr Med; 2021; 20(3):212-221. PubMed ID: 34558451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy.
Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital holographic microscopy as screening tool for cervical cancer preliminary study.
Benzerdjeb N; Garbar C; Camparo P; Sevestre H
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Aug; 124(8):573-80. PubMed ID: 27136615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Study of Pap Smears in HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Women from a Tertiary Care Center in South India.
Gupta K; Philipose CS; Rai S; Ramapuram J; Kaur G; Kini H; Gv C; Adiga D
Acta Cytol; 2019; 63(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 30721904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Presence of koilocytosis in low-grade smears of high-risk HPV-positive women is a negative predictor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or more.
Siebers AG; van der Linden H; Vedder JEM; Bekkers RLM; Melchers WLG; Bulten J
Cytopathology; 2018 Jun; 29(3):275-280. PubMed ID: 29575519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Results of screening for cervical cancer among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Brazil.
Xavier-Júnior JC; Vale DB; Vieira LF; Lima MT; Zeferino LC; Dufloth RM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jul; 130(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 26044115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal Pap smears: a meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.
Arbyn M; Buntinx F; Van Ranst M; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch P; Dillner J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Feb; 96(4):280-93. PubMed ID: 14970277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
