These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36739868)

  • 1. Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique Combined with Air Tamponade in the Treatment of Macular Holes in High Myopia.
    Zhang K; Yang X; Qi B; Wu X; Wang X; Liu W
    Ophthalmic Res; 2023; 66(1):569-578. PubMed ID: 36739868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole Retinal Detachment in High Myopia.
    Matsumae H; Morizane Y; Yamane S; Yanagisawa S; Sakurai T; Kobori A; Imai H; Kanzaki Y; Suzuki E; Kadonosono K; Hayashi A; Shiraga F; Kuriyama S
    Ophthalmol Retina; 2020 Sep; 4(9):919-926. PubMed ID: 32448780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole.
    Ghoraba H; Rittiphairoj T; Akhavanrezayat A; Karaca I; Matsumiya W; Pham B; Mishra K; Yasar C; Mobasserian A; Abdelkarem AA; Nguyen QD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Aug; 8(8):CD015031. PubMed ID: 37548231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EFFICACY OF THE INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE WITH VITRECTOMY FOR RETINAL DETACHMENT ASSOCIATED WITH MYOPIC MACULAR HOLES.
    Baba R; Wakabayashi Y; Umazume K; Ishikawa T; Yagi H; Muramatsu D; Goto H
    Retina; 2017 Mar; 37(3):466-471. PubMed ID: 28225722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study.
    Ramtohul P; Parrat E; Denis D; Lorenzi U
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):11. PubMed ID: 31907015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique as a useful procedure for macular hole-associated retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.
    Sasaki H; Shiono A; Kogo J; Yomoda R; Munemasa Y; Syoda M; Otake H; Kurihara H; Kitaoka Y; Takagi H
    Eye (Lond); 2017 Apr; 31(4):545-550. PubMed ID: 27911448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap for large macular hole treatment.
    Koçak N; Yeter V; Birinci H
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 71(1):188-194. PubMed ID: 36588234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inverted internal limiting membrane insertion versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia: one-year study.
    Wakabayashi T; Ikuno Y; Shiraki N; Matsumura N; Sakaguchi H; Nishida K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 256(8):1387-1393. PubMed ID: 29911271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Yuan J; Zhang LL; Lu YJ; Han MY; Yu AH; Cai XJ
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):219. PubMed ID: 29179705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Functional and Anatomic Outcomes of Primary and Secondary Internal Limiting Membrane Transplantation in Large and Persistent Macular Holes].
    Hess JA; Michels S; Becker MD
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2018 Oct; 235(10):1159-1164. PubMed ID: 29156470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative efficacy evaluation of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique and internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular holes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shen Y; Lin X; Zhang L; Wu M
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 31914954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS INVERTED FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN A LARGE SERIES OF PATIENTS.
    Rizzo S; Tartaro R; Barca F; Caporossi T; Bacherini D; Giansanti F
    Retina; 2018 Sep; 38 Suppl 1():S73-S78. PubMed ID: 29232338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SURGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP VERSUS CONVENTIONAL PEELING FOR VERY LARGE MACULAR HOLES.
    Narayanan R; Singh SR; Taylor S; Berrocal MH; Chhablani J; Tyagi M; Ohno-Matsui K; Pappuru RR; Apte RS
    Retina; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1465-1469. PubMed ID: 29689027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study.
    Agrawal V; Jindal K; Dhakad Y; Rathore P; Khilnani K
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Mar; 70(3):909-913. PubMed ID: 35225542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Large Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery: Remodelling of Outer Retinal Layers after Traditional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique.
    Bottoni F; Parrulli S; Mete M; D'Agostino I; Cereda M; Cigada M; Maggio E; Maraone G; Iacovello D; Bottega E; Staurenghi G; Pertile G
    Ophthalmologica; 2020; 243(5):334-341. PubMed ID: 31940651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PERFLUOROCARBON LIQUID-ASSISTED INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE VERSUS INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING FOR HIGHLY MYOPIC MACULAR HOLE RETINAL DETACHMENT.
    Gu X; Hu Z; Qian H; Fransisca S; Mugisha A; Wang J; Zhang Z; Zhang W; Ji J; Liu Q; Xie P
    Retina; 2021 Feb; 41(2):317-323. PubMed ID: 32453066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the use of internal limiting membrane flaps versus conventional ILM peeling on post-operative anatomical and visual outcomes in large macular holes.
    Riding G; Teh BL; Yorston D; Steel DH
    Eye (Lond); 2024 Jul; 38(10):1876-1881. PubMed ID: 38493269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. COMPARISON OF INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING WITH THE INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT COEXISTING WITH MACULAR HOLE.
    Liu X; Huang J; Zhou R; Jiang Z; Chen H; Chen W; Ng TK; Wu Z; Zhang G
    Retina; 2022 Apr; 42(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 35350048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with or without inverted flap technique for myopic foveoschisis.
    Zheng D; Huang Z; Zeng Q; Wang Y; Chen S; Yi J; Fang D; Huang D; Chen W
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):444. PubMed ID: 36401229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap and ILM peeling technique in large macular holes: a randomized-control trial.
    Kannan NB; Kohli P; Parida H; Adenuga OO; Ramasamy K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):177. PubMed ID: 30029621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.