125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36740170)
1. Inter-annual variation of physiological traits between urban and forest great tits.
Saulnier A; Bleu J; Boos A; Millet M; Zahn S; Ronot P; El Masoudi I; Rojas ER; Uhlrich P; Del Nero M; Massemin S
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol; 2023 May; 279():111385. PubMed ID: 36740170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urban versus forest ecotypes are not explained by divergent reproductive selection.
Caizergues AE; Grégoire A; Charmantier A
Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Jul; 285(1882):. PubMed ID: 30051819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urbanisation-associated shifts in the avian metabolome within the annual cycle.
Watson H; Nilsson JÅ; Smith E; Ottosson F; Melander O; Hegemann A; Urhan U; Isaksson C
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Sep; 944():173624. PubMed ID: 38821291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urban environment shortens telomere length in nestling great tits, Parus major.
Salmón P; Nilsson JF; Nord A; Bensch S; Isaksson C
Biol Lett; 2016 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 27303051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are behaviour and stress-related phenotypes in urban birds adaptive?
Caizergues AE; Grégoire A; Choquet R; Perret S; Charmantier A
J Anim Ecol; 2022 Aug; 91(8):1627-1641. PubMed ID: 35575101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Great tits feed their nestlings with more but smaller prey items and fewer caterpillars in cities than in forests.
Sinkovics C; Seress G; Pipoly I; Vincze E; Liker A
Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):24161. PubMed ID: 34921179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic structure of urban and non-urban populations differs between two common parid species.
Markowski M; Minias P; Bańbura M; Glądalski M; Kaliński A; Skwarska J; Wawrzyniak J; Zieliński P; Bańbura J
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10428. PubMed ID: 34001959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Selective disappearance of great tits with short telomeres in urban areas.
Salmón P; Nilsson JF; Watson H; Bensch S; Isaksson C
Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Sep; 284(1862):. PubMed ID: 28878065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Urban blackbirds have shorter telomeres.
Ibáñez-Álamo JD; Pineda-Pampliega J; Thomson RL; Aguirre JI; Díez-Fernández A; Faivre B; Figuerola J; Verhulst S
Biol Lett; 2018 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 29563283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Providing urban birds nutritious food to feed chicks reduces urban versus rural breeding success disparities.
Derryberry EP; Coomes CM
J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jul; 89(7):1546-1548. PubMed ID: 32627886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does offspring sex ratio differ between urban and forest populations of great tits (Parus major)?
Ágh N; Pipoly I; Szabó K; Vincze E; Bókony V; Seress G; Liker A
Biol Futur; 2020 Jun; 71(1-2):99-108. PubMed ID: 34554536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The traits that predict the magnitude and spatial scale of forest bird responses to urbanization intensity.
Paton GD; Shoffner AV; Wilson AM; Gagné SA
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220120. PubMed ID: 31344134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Food availability limits avian reproduction in the city: An experimental study on great tits Parus major.
Seress G; Sándor K; Evans KL; Liker A
J Anim Ecol; 2020 Jul; 89(7):1570-1580. PubMed ID: 32419138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The preference and costs of sleeping under light at night in forest and urban great tits.
Ulgezen ZN; Käpylä T; Meerlo P; Spoelstra K; Visser ME; Dominoni DM
Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Jun; 286(1905):20190872. PubMed ID: 31213184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Negative impact of urban habitat on immunity in the great tit Parus major.
Bailly J; Scheifler R; Belvalette M; Garnier S; Boissier E; Clément-Demange VA; Gète M; Leblond M; Pasteur B; Piget Q; Sage M; Faivre B
Oecologia; 2016 Dec; 182(4):1053-1062. PubMed ID: 27646717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Problem-solving performance and reproductive success of great tits in urban and forest habitats.
Preiszner B; Papp S; Pipoly I; Seress G; Vincze E; Liker A; Bókony V
Anim Cogn; 2017 Jan; 20(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 27294267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of urbanization on the micronucleus frequency in birds from forest fragments.
Baesse CQ; Tolentino VCM; Morelli S; Melo C
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2019 Apr; 171():631-637. PubMed ID: 30658298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of breeding habitat (woodland versus urban) and metal pollution on the egg characteristics of great tits (Parus major).
Hargitai R; Nagy G; Nyiri Z; Bervoets L; Eke Z; Eens M; Török J
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Feb; 544():31-8. PubMed ID: 26657247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumer resource matching in urbanizing landscapes: are synanthropic species over-matching?
Rodewald AD; Shustack DP
Ecology; 2008 Feb; 89(2):515-21. PubMed ID: 18409440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of urbanization on abundance and phenology of caterpillars and consequences for breeding in an insectivorous bird.
Seress G; Hammer T; Bókony V; Vincze E; Preiszner B; Pipoly I; Sinkovics C; Evans KL; Liker A
Ecol Appl; 2018 Jul; 28(5):1143-1156. PubMed ID: 29679462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
