BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36740508)

  • 1. Direct comparison between Grade Group assessed on systematic and MRI/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies correlated to the radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer.
    Payrard-Starck C; Fourcade A; An Nguyen T; Tissot V; Doucet L; Marolleau J; Lucas C; Fournier G; Valeri A
    Prog Urol; 2023 Apr; 33(5):265-271. PubMed ID: 36740508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PI-RADS Version 2.0 Versus Version 2.1: Comparison of Prostate Cancer Gleason Grade Upgrade and Downgrade Rates From MRI-Targeted Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.
    Yilmaz EC; Lin Y; Belue MJ; Harmon SA; Phelps TE; Merriman KM; Hazen LA; Garcia C; Johnson L; Lay NS; Toubaji A; Merino MJ; Patel KR; Parnes HL; Law YM; Wood BJ; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329964. PubMed ID: 37729551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study.
    Zattoni F; Marra G; Martini A; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Harkin T; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Marquis A; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Morlacco A; Kretschmer A; Barletta F; Heidegger I; Tilki D; van den Bergh R; Dal Moro F; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Novara G; Gandaglia G;
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 36746729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Targeted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Quantitative Gleason 4 Grading Prediction in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance Candidate Selection.
    Kachanov M; Budäus L; Beyersdorff D; Karakiewicz PI; Tian Z; Falkenbach F; Tilki D; Maurer T; Sauter G; Graefen M; Leyh-Bannurah SR
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):303-308. PubMed ID: 36184537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of mpMRI-targeted vs systematic biopsy on the risk of prostate cancer downgrading at final pathology.
    Sorce G; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Mazzone E; Mattei A; Afferi L; Serni S; Minervini A; Roumiguiè M; Malavaud B; Valerio M; Rakauskas A; Marra G; Gontero P; Porpiglia F; Guo H; Zhuang J; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    World J Urol; 2024 Apr; 42(1):248. PubMed ID: 38647689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score.
    Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Passera R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Bollito E; DE Pascale A; Cossu M; Aimar R; Veltri A
    Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4833-9. PubMed ID: 27630337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
    Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results with final histopathology in patients with proven prostate cancer in MRI/ultrasonography-fusion biopsy.
    Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth M
    BJU Int; 2016 Aug; 118(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 26935133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Fourcade A; Payrard C; Tissot V; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Demany N; Serey-Effeil S; Callerot P; Coquet JB; Doucet L; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Nonent M; Fournier G; Valeri A
    Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):174-179. PubMed ID: 29463177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of TRUS and combined MRI-targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy for the concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.
    Aslan G; Çelik S; Sözen S; Akdoğan B; İzol V; Yücel Bilen C; Sahin B; Türkeri L;
    Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Mar; 75(3):e13797. PubMed ID: 33113261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
    Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
    Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging target fusion biopsy vs. transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy - A comparative study of ISUP score upgrading risk in the final radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Guimarães T; Gil M; Medeiros M; Andrade V; Guerra J; Pinheiro H; Fernandes F; Pina J; Lopes Dias J; Campos Pinheiro L
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Sep; 94(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 36165470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
    Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
    Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing Image-guided targeted Biopsies to Radical Prostatectomy Specimens for Accurate Characterization of the Index Tumor in Prostate Cancer.
    Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Checcucci E; Garrou D; Manfredi M; Mele F; Pecoraro A; Passera R; Bollito E; Fiori C
    Anticancer Res; 2018 May; 38(5):3043-3047. PubMed ID: 29715138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of elastic fusion biopsy: Comparing prostate cancer detection between targeted and systematic biopsy.
    Oderda M; Albisinni S; Benamran D; Calleris G; Ciccariello M; Dematteis A; Diamand R; Descotes JL; Fiard G; Forte V; Giacobbe A; Marquis A; Marra G; Messas A; Muto G; Peltier A; Rius L; Simone G; Roumeguere T; Faletti R; Gontero P
    Prostate; 2023 Feb; 83(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 36259316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients and the risk of overtreatment in prostate cancer: a grading issue.
    Jabbour T; Peltier A; Rocq L; Sirtaine N; Lefebvre Y; Bourgeno H; Baudewyns A; Roumeguère T; Diamand R
    BJU Int; 2024 Apr; 133(4):432-441. PubMed ID: 37943114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy of biopsy naïve men diagnosed with MRI targeted biopsy alone without concomitant standard systematic sampling.
    Luzzago S; Petralia G; Maresca D; Sabatini I; Cordima G; Brescia A; Verweij F; Garelli G; Mistretta FA; Cioffi A; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
    Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):929.e11-929.e19. PubMed ID: 32600928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of Gleason Score 3+4=7 prostate cancer upgrading at radical prostatectomy is significantly reduced by targeted versus standard biopsy.
    De Luca S; Fiori C; Bollito E; Garrou D; Aimar R; Cattaneo G; De Cillis S; Manfredi M; Tota D; Federica M; Passera R; Porpiglia F
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Jun; 72(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 31619029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
    Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.
    Radtke JP; Takhar M; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Erho N; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Ong K; Davicioni E; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28753844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.