These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36742863)

  • 21. Effect of Wearing Different Masks on Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Formant Parameters.
    Gao Y; Feng Y; Wu D; Lu F; He H; Tian C
    J Voice; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37541926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
    Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acoustic Voice Analysis of Young Turkish Speakers.
    Demirhan E; Unsal EM; Yilmaz C; Ertan E
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):378.e21-5. PubMed ID: 26223964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multidimensional Voice Data on Participants With Perceptually Normal Voices From Ages 60 to 80: A Preliminary Acoustic Reference for the Elderly Population.
    Schaeffer N; Knudsen M; Small A
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):631-7. PubMed ID: 25683920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can Voice Parameters Provide Cutoff Values to Predict Dysphagia in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis?
    Sapmaz Atalar M; Genç G; Işık EE; Cangi ME; Pehlivan B; Bulut S
    Dysphagia; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38872058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How Does Long Term Use of Surgical Face Mask Affect the Voice in Normophonic Subjects?
    Tunç-Songur E; Gölaç H; Önen Ç; Duyar TR; Yılmaz M; Kemaloğlu YK
    J Voice; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36907682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigating the Effects of Warm-up Exercises on Acoustic Characteristics of Voice in Female Gym Coaches.
    Ghazi S; Jamali J; Ghaemi H
    J Voice; 2023 Nov; 37(6):881-885. PubMed ID: 34274189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acoustic analysis of voice: Iranian teachers.
    Dehqan A; Scherer RC
    J Voice; 2013 Sep; 27(5):655.e17-21. PubMed ID: 23683802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An Assessment of Different Praat Versions for Acoustic Measures Analyzed Automatically by VoiceEvalU8 and Manually by Two Raters.
    Grillo EU; Wolfberg J
    J Voice; 2023 Jan; 37(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 33384248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acoustic vocal measures in women without voice complaints and with normal larynxes.
    Finger LS; Cielo CA; Schwarz K
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2009; 75(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 19649496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acoustic Characteristics of Short Vowels by Normal Nepali Young Adults.
    Rai A; Dawadee P; Chaithra C
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Dec; 74(Suppl 3):5012-5015. PubMed ID: 36742742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Acoustic markers to differentiate gender in prepubescent children's speaking and singing voice.
    Guzman M; Muñoz D; Vivero M; Marín N; Ramírez M; Rivera MT; Vidal C; Gerhard J; González C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 78(10):1592-8. PubMed ID: 25085074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of Acoustic Analysis Measurements in the Evaluation of Patients With Different Laryngeal Diagnoses.
    Lopes LW; Batista Simões L; Delfino da Silva J; da Silva Evangelista D; da Nóbrega E Ugulino AC; Oliveira Costa Silva P; Jefferson Dias Vieira V
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):382.e15-382.e26. PubMed ID: 27742492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of Acoustic Analyses of Voice in Nonoptimized Conditions.
    van der Woerd B; Wu M; Parsa V; Doyle PC; Fung K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):3991-3999. PubMed ID: 33186510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Objective Evaluation of Presbyphonia: Spectroacoustic Study on 142 Patients with Praat.
    Mezzedimi C; Di Francesco M; Livi W; Spinosi MC; De Felice C
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e25-257.e32. PubMed ID: 27427181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Objective study of the voice in a normal population and in dysphonia caused by nodules and vocal polyps].
    Casado Morente JC; Adrián Torres JA; Conde Jiménez M; Piédrola Maroto D; Povedano Rodríguez V; Muñoz Gomariz E; Cantillo Baños E; Jurado Ramos A
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2001; 52(6):476-82. PubMed ID: 11692962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Variability in the digital voice analysis depending on the analyzed vocal, in normal patients and in patients with dysphonia].
    Preciado López JA; Calzada Uriondo MG; Zabaleta López M; García Cano FJ
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2000 Oct; 51(7):618-28. PubMed ID: 11270041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative study of acoustic voice measurements by means of Dr. Speech and Computerized Speech Lab.
    Smits I; Ceuppens P; De Bodt MS
    J Voice; 2005 Jun; 19(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 15907433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2005; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 15655340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fundamental Frequency and Jitter Percent in MDVP and PRAAT.
    Mohammed AA; Nagy A
    J Voice; 2023 Jul; 37(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 33926765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.