BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36745404)

  • 1. Hooks Versus Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison.
    Colantonio DF; Le AH; Pisano AJ; Chung JM; Wagner SC; Fredericks DR; Roach WB; Schlaff C; Dill A; Mauntel TC; Hendershot BD; Helgeson MD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Apr; 48(7):E94-E100. PubMed ID: 36745404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of posterior polyester tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis: a finite element analysis.
    Bess S; Harris JE; Turner AW; LaFage V; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Schwab FJ; Haid RW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jan; 26(1):125-133. PubMed ID: 27611508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transverse process hooks at upper instrumented vertebra provide more gradual motion transition than pedicle screws.
    Thawrani DP; Glos DL; Coombs MT; Bylski-Austrow DI; Sturm PF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(14):E826-32. PubMed ID: 24732851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinically relevant biomechanical properties of three different fixation techniques of the upper instrumented vertebra in deformity surgery.
    Nevzati E; Moser M; Dietz N; Yaszay B; Lenke LG; Farshad M; Arvind V; Cho SK; Spiessberger A
    Spine Deform; 2022 Sep; 10(5):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 35428950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical assessment of proximal junctional semi-rigid fixation in long-segment thoracolumbar constructs.
    Viswanathan VK; Ganguly R; Minnema AJ; DeVries Watson NA; Grosland NM; Fredericks DC; Grossbach AJ; Viljoen SV; Farhadi HF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):184-192. PubMed ID: 30497219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction.
    Doodkorte RJP; Roth AK; Arts JJ; Lataster LMA; van Rhijn LW; Willems PC
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):855-864. PubMed ID: 33493681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prevention of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: Are Polyaxial Pedicle Screws Superior to Monoaxial Pedicle Screws at the Upper Instrumented Vertebrae?
    Wang H; Ding W; Ma L; Zhang L; Yang D
    World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():405-415. PubMed ID: 28216210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal Anchor at the Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra in Long Fusion From the Pelvis to the Lower Thoracic Spine in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Spinal Deformity: Hook Versus Pedicle Screw.
    Tsutsui S; Hashizume H; Yukawa Y; Minamide A; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Takami M; Yamada H
    Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Feb; 35(1):E280-E284. PubMed ID: 34039893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of multilevel posterior ligament dissection after spinal instrumentation on adjacent segment biomechanics as a potential risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis: a biomechanical study.
    Lange T; Schulte TL; Gosheger G; Schulze Boevingloh A; Mayr R; Schmoelz W
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Feb; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 29444669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. T9 versus T10 as the upper instrumented vertebra for correction of adult deformity-rationale and recommendations.
    Hey HWD; Tan KA; Neo CS; Lau ET; Choong DA; Lau LL; Liu GK; Wong HK
    Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):615-621. PubMed ID: 27856380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Caudally directed upper-instrumented vertebra pedicle screws associated with minimized risk of proximal junctional failure in patients with long posterior spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Harris AB; Kebaish FN; Puvanesarajah V; Raad M; Wilkening MW; Jain A; Cohen DB; Neuman BJ; Kebaish KM
    Spine J; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 33722729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
    Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of posterior tethers on the biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis: The whole human finite element model analysis.
    Yagi M; Nakahira Y; Watanabe K; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Iwamoto M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):3433. PubMed ID: 32103040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The potential of proximal junctional kyphosis prevention using a novel tether pedicle screw construct: an in silico study comparing the influence of standard and dynamic techniques on adjacent-level range of motion and load pattern.
    Decker S; Koller H; Overes T; Montali A; Clin J; Hachem B
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 May; 40(5):611-621. PubMed ID: 38394650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
    Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.