These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3674597)
1. Incidental appendectomy with cholecystectomy: is the increased risk justified? Andrew MH; Roty AR Am Surg; 1987 Oct; 53(10):553-7. PubMed ID: 3674597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Appendectomy incidental to cholecystectomy among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Warren JL; Penberthy LT; Addiss DG; McBean AM Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Sep; 177(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 8356501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidental appendectomy?--Yes. Tranmer BI; Graham AM; Sterns EE Can J Surg; 1981 Mar; 24(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 7225974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appendicectomy at cholecystectomy--an appraisal. Donaldson DR; Jones K; Aubrey DA Br J Clin Pract; 1989 Jan; 43(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2590618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. Giger UF; Michel JM; Opitz I; Th Inderbitzin D; Kocher T; Krähenbühl L; J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):723-8. PubMed ID: 17084335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of the results of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Richards W; Watson D; Lynch G; Reed GW; Olsen D; Spaw A; Holcomb W; Frexes-Steed M; Goldstein R; Sharp K Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Nov; 177(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 8211599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cholecystectomy with and without drainage. Kassum DA; Gagic NM; Menon GT Can J Surg; 1979 Jul; 22(4):358-60. PubMed ID: 455165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidental cholecystectomy in the over-70 age group. A 19-year retrospective, comparative study. Watemberg S; Landau O; Avrahami R; Nudelman IL; Reiss R Int Surg; 1997; 82(1):102-4. PubMed ID: 9189816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is incidental appendectomy a safe practice? Voitk AJ; Lowry JB Can J Surg; 1988 Nov; 31(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 3179856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: is the postoperative infectious complication rate different? Hoehne F; Ozaeta M; Sherman B; Miani P; Taylor E Am Surg; 2005 Oct; 71(10):813-5. PubMed ID: 16468525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should drains be used in routine cholecystectomy? Cathcart RS; Gregorie HB Am Surg; 1984 Sep; 50(9):482-4. PubMed ID: 6476610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open cholecystectomy: its morbidity and mortality as a reference standard. Girard RM; Morin M Can J Surg; 1993 Feb; 36(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8443723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidental appendectomy and its effect on the incidence of wound infection in cholecystectomy. Bogart JN; Sebesta DG Am Surg; 1969 Sep; 35(9):650-2. PubMed ID: 5810493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic versus open treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis. Koperna T; Kisser M; Schulz F Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(26):753-7. PubMed ID: 10370605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of biliary infection on the postoperative course after biliary tract surgery. Wolloch Y; Feigenberg Z; Zer M; Dintsman M Am J Gastroenterol; 1977 May; 67(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 900109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cholecystectomy in the elderly. Margiotta SJ; Willis IH; Wallack MK Am Surg; 1988 Jan; 54(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 3337481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical treatment of the acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic age. A comparative study: laparoscopy against laparatomy. Carbajo Caballero MA; Martín del Olmo JC; Blanco Alvarez JI; Cuesta de la Llave C; Atienza Sánchez R; Inglada Galiana L; Vaquero Puerta C Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1998 Nov; 90(11):788-93. PubMed ID: 9866411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]