These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36746729)
1. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy on the Risk of Upgrading in Final Pathology in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy? An European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Study. Zattoni F; Marra G; Martini A; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Harkin T; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Marquis A; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Morlacco A; Kretschmer A; Barletta F; Heidegger I; Tilki D; van den Bergh R; Dal Moro F; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Novara G; Gandaglia G; Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 36746729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior with the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-Institutional Study. Zattoni F; Marra G; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Nandurkar R; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Barletta F; Leni R; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Hanegbi U; Landaumailto A; Snow R; Apfelbeck M; Kretschmer A; van den Bergh R; Novara G; Briganti A; Dal Moro F; Gandaglia G J Urol; 2022 Oct; 208(4):830-837. PubMed ID: 36082555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches. Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. Zattoni F; Rajwa P; Miszczyk M; Fazekas T; Carletti F; Carrozza S; Sattin F; Reitano G; Botti S; Matsukawa A; Dal Moro F; Jeffrey Karnes R; Briganti A; Novara G; Shariat SF; Ploussard G; Gandaglia G Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Dec; 7(6):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 39095298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Final Results of the Randomized PERFECT trial (CCAFU-PR1). Ploussard G; Barret E; Fiard G; Lenfant L; Malavaud B; Giannarini G; Almeras C; Aziza R; Renard-Penna R; Descotes JL; Rozet F; Beauval JB; Salin A; Rouprêt M Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Oct; 7(5):1080-1087. PubMed ID: 38403523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct comparison between Grade Group assessed on systematic and MRI/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies correlated to the radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer. Payrard-Starck C; Fourcade A; An Nguyen T; Tissot V; Doucet L; Marolleau J; Lucas C; Fournier G; Valeri A Prog Urol; 2023 Apr; 33(5):265-271. PubMed ID: 36740508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gleason grade accuracy of transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsies in MRI-naïve patients. Qu LG; Al-Shawi M; Howard T; Papa N; Poyet C; Kelly B; Egan AJM; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D; Jack GS Int Urol Nephrol; 2021 Dec; 53(12):2445-2452. PubMed ID: 34623591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Goel S; Shoag JE; Gross MD; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Robinson B; Khani F; Baltich Nelson B; Margolis DJ; Hu JC Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 31492650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of TRUS and combined MRI-targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy for the concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Aslan G; Çelik S; Sözen S; Akdoğan B; İzol V; Yücel Bilen C; Sahin B; Türkeri L; Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Mar; 75(3):e13797. PubMed ID: 33113261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeting on Pathologic Upgrading and Downgrading at Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Weinstein IC; Wu X; Hill A; Brennan D; Omil-Lima D; Basourakos S; Brant A; Lewicki P; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Spratt D; Bittencourt LK; Scherr D; Zaorsky NG; Nagar H; Hu J; Barbieri C; Ponsky L; Vickers AJ; Shoag JE Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 6(4):355-365. PubMed ID: 37236832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of mpMRI-targeted vs systematic biopsy on the risk of prostate cancer downgrading at final pathology. Sorce G; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Mazzone E; Mattei A; Afferi L; Serni S; Minervini A; Roumiguiè M; Malavaud B; Valerio M; Rakauskas A; Marra G; Gontero P; Porpiglia F; Guo H; Zhuang J; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A World J Urol; 2024 Apr; 42(1):248. PubMed ID: 38647689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PI-RADS Version 2.0 Versus Version 2.1: Comparison of Prostate Cancer Gleason Grade Upgrade and Downgrade Rates From MRI-Targeted Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy. Yilmaz EC; Lin Y; Belue MJ; Harmon SA; Phelps TE; Merriman KM; Hazen LA; Garcia C; Johnson L; Lay NS; Toubaji A; Merino MJ; Patel KR; Parnes HL; Law YM; Wood BJ; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329964. PubMed ID: 37729551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy. Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Mattei A; Fiori C; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Moschini M; Zamboni S; Rakauskas A; Tian Z; Karakiewicz PI; De Cobelli F; Porpiglia F; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):733-741. PubMed ID: 31547938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Uleri A; Baboudjian M; Tedde A; Gallioli A; Long-Depaquit T; Palou J; Basile G; Gaya JM; Sanguedolce F; Lughezzani G; Rajwa P; Pradere B; Roupret M; Briganti A; Ploussard G; Breda A Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):621-628. PubMed ID: 37634971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Highest Grade Group Does Not Drive the Risk of Recurrence when Systematic and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-targeted Biopsies are Discordant: Preliminary Findings Using Radical Prostatectomy Pathology as a Surrogate for MRI-targeted Biopsy Grade. Scuderi S; Pellegrino F; Tin A; Beech BB; Gandaglia G; Stabile A; Eastham JA; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Vickers AJ Eur Urol Focus; 2024 May; 10(3):486-488. PubMed ID: 37739916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histopathological concordance between prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens-implications of transrectal and transperineal biopsy approaches. Hagens MJ; Ribbert LLA; Jager A; Veerman H; Barwari K; Boodt B; de Bruijn RE; Claessen A; Leter MR; van der Noort V; Smeenge M; Roeleveld TA; Rynja SP; Schaaf M; Weltings S; Vis AN; Bekers E; van Leeuwen PJ; van der Poel HG Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 Jun; 27(2):312-317. PubMed ID: 37660218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging target fusion biopsy vs. transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy - A comparative study of ISUP score upgrading risk in the final radical prostatectomy specimen. Guimarães T; Gil M; Medeiros M; Andrade V; Guerra J; Pinheiro H; Fernandes F; Pina J; Lopes Dias J; Campos Pinheiro L Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Sep; 94(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 36165470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy for predicting the final laterality of prostate cancer: are they reliable enough to select patients for focal therapy? Results from a multicenter international study. Miano R; De Nunzio C; Kim FJ; Rocco B; Gontero P; Vicentini C; Micali S; Oderda M; Masciovecchio S; Asimakopoulos AD Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 24642146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]