245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36746729)
21. The role of perilesional and multiparametric resonance imaging-targeted biopsies to reduce the risk of upgrading at radical prostatectomy pathology: A retrospective monocentric study.
Diamand R; Hollans M; Lefebvre Y; Sirtaine N; Limani K; Hawaux E; Abou Zahr R; Mattlet A; Albisinni S; Roumeguère T; Peltier A
Urol Oncol; 2022 May; 40(5):192.e11-192.e17. PubMed ID: 35236622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy of biopsy naïve men diagnosed with MRI targeted biopsy alone without concomitant standard systematic sampling.
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Maresca D; Sabatini I; Cordima G; Brescia A; Verweij F; Garelli G; Mistretta FA; Cioffi A; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):929.e11-929.e19. PubMed ID: 32600928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients and the risk of overtreatment in prostate cancer: a grading issue.
Jabbour T; Peltier A; Rocq L; Sirtaine N; Lefebvre Y; Bourgeno H; Baudewyns A; Roumeguère T; Diamand R
BJU Int; 2024 Apr; 133(4):432-441. PubMed ID: 37943114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk of Gleason Score 3+4=7 prostate cancer upgrading at radical prostatectomy is significantly reduced by targeted versus standard biopsy.
De Luca S; Fiori C; Bollito E; Garrou D; Aimar R; Cattaneo G; De Cillis S; Manfredi M; Tota D; Federica M; Passera R; Porpiglia F
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Jun; 72(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 31619029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary?
Osses DF; Drost FH; Verbeek JFM; Luiting HB; van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Roobol MJ; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 32232921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detection of extraprostatic extension by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted combined with systemic template prostate biopsy.
Chuang HW; Wu S; Lin SX; Zhao T; Kim MM; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Dahl DM; Wu CL
Diagn Pathol; 2023 Sep; 18(1):101. PubMed ID: 37697349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score.
Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Passera R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Bollito E; DE Pascale A; Cossu M; Aimar R; Veltri A
Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4833-9. PubMed ID: 27630337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the Upgrading Rates of International Society of Urological Pathology Grades and Tumor Laterality in Patients Undergoing Standard 12-Core Prostate Biopsy versus Fusion Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer.
Demirtaş A; Sönmez G; Tombul ŞT; Demirtaş T; Akgün H
Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):256-261. PubMed ID: 31242496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Winoker JS; Wajswol E; Falagario U; Maritini A; Moshier E; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():278-286. PubMed ID: 32956688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Takeshima Y; Yamada Y; Teshima T; Fujimura T; Kakutani S; Hakozaki Y; Kimura N; Akiyama Y; Sato Y; Kawai T; Yamada D; Kume H
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):501. PubMed ID: 33947348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted Biopsy with Four Cores Versus Target Saturation Biopsy with Nine Cores in Transperineal Prostate Fusion Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Saner YM; Wiesenfarth M; Weru V; Ladyzhensky B; Tschirdewahn S; Püllen L; Bonekamp D; Reis H; Krafft U; Heß J; Kesch C; Darr C; Forsting M; Wetter A; Umutlu L; Haubold J; Hadaschik B; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 6(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 36175281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optimizing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and prostate cancer grading accuracy.
Diamand R; Peltier A; Roche JB; Lievore E; Lacetera V; Chiacchio G; Beatrici V; Mastroianni R; Simone G; Windisch O; Benamran D; Fourcade A; Nguyen TA; Fournier G; Fiard G; Ploussard G; Roumeguère T; Albisinni S
World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 36509932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical implementation of pre-biopsy magnetic resonance imaging pathways for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Israël B; Immerzeel J; van der Leest M; Hannink G; Zámecnik P; Bomers J; Schoots IG; van Basten JP; Debruyne F; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Barentsz J
BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):480-490. PubMed ID: 34358388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsies: 2-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (PRECISE).
Klotz L; Chin J; Black PC; Finelli A; Anidjar M; Machado A; Levental M; Ghai S; Chang SD; Patel C; Kassam Z; Loblaw A; Kebabdjian M; Pond G; Haider MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 7(3):456-461. PubMed ID: 37838556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.
Velez E; Fedorov A; Tuncali K; Olubiyi O; Allard CB; Kibel AS; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Aug; 42(8):2154-2159. PubMed ID: 28293720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates.
Dahl DM; Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL
Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):451.e9-451.e14. PubMed ID: 36008257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
