These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36748215)

  • 1. Validity of Radiographic Analyses Between Hand-Drawn and Computer- Aided Measurements: A Double-Blinded Test-Retest Trial.
    Fedorchuk C; Comer RD; McRae C; Bak D; Lightstone DF
    Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(9):1071-1078. PubMed ID: 36748215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-Examiner Reliability and Validity of Sagittal Cervical Spine Mensuration Methods Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
    Hosseini MM; Mahoor MH; Haas JW; Ferrantelli JR; Dupuis AL; Jaeger JO; Harrison DE
    J Clin Med; 2024 Apr; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 38731102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Further analysis of the reliability of the posterior tangent lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure: concurrent validity of computer-aided X-ray digitization.
    Troyanovich SJ; Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Holland B; Janik TJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998 Sep; 21(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 9777546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further reliability analysis of the Harrison radiographic line-drawing methods: crossed ICCs for lateral posterior tangents and modified Risser-Ferguson method on AP views.
    Harrison DE; Holland B; Harrison DD; Janik TJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002 Feb; 25(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 11896376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra- and interexaminer reliability of the chiropractic biophysics lateral lumbar radiographic mensuration procedure.
    Troyanovich SJ; Robertson GA; Harrison DD; Holland B
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Oct; 18(8):519-24. PubMed ID: 8583174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra-observer reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the radiographic parameters in the Spinal Deformity Study Group's AIS Radiographic Measurement Manual.
    Dang NR; Moreau MJ; Hill DL; Mahood JK; Raso J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(9):1064-9. PubMed ID: 15864160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis.
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Cailliet R; Troyanovich SJ; Janik TJ; Holland B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(16):2072-8. PubMed ID: 10954638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters.
    Lafage R; Ferrero E; Henry JK; Challier V; Diebo B; Liabaud B; Lafage V; Schwab F
    Spine J; 2015 Dec; 15(12):2493-502. PubMed ID: 26343243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods.
    Harrison DE; Harrison DD; Cailliet R; Janik TJ; Holland B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jun; 26(11):E235-42. PubMed ID: 11389407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of a smartphone protractor to measure sagittal parameters in adult spinal deformity.
    Kunkle WA; Madden M; Potts S; Fogelson J; Hershman S
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1559-1564. PubMed ID: 28818564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the validity and reliability of spinopelvic parameters through comparing standing whole spinal radiographs and upright computed tomography images.
    Fujita N; Yagi M; Watanabe K; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Yokoyama Y; Yamada M; Yamada Y; Nagura T; Jinzaki M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Oct; 22(1):899. PubMed ID: 34696744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis.
    Harrison DE; Cailliet R; Harrison DD; Janik TJ; Holland B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jun; 26(11):E227-34. PubMed ID: 11389406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of accuracy of kyphotic angle measurement for vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures.
    Lee SW; Hong JT; Son BC; Sung JH; Kim IS; Park CK
    J Clin Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 14(10):961-5. PubMed ID: 17646103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of prone intraoperative measurements of global spinal alignment.
    Vaynrub M; Hirsch BP; Tishelman J; Vasquez-Montes D; Buckland AJ; Errico TJ; Protopsaltis TS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Aug; 29(2):187-192. PubMed ID: 29775162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chiropractic biophysics digitized radiographic mensuration analysis of the anteroposterior cervicothoracic view: a reliability study.
    Troyanovich SJ; Harrison D; Harrison DD; Harrison SO; Janik T; Holland B
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Sep; 23(7):476-82. PubMed ID: 11004652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Line drawing analyses of static cervical X ray used in chiropractic.
    Owens EF
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Sep; 15(7):442-9. PubMed ID: 1431632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity and reliability of ankle morphological measurements on computerized tomography-synthesized planar radiographs.
    Kuo CC; Lu HL; Lu TW; Leardini A; Kuo MY; Hsu HC
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Aug; 15(1):92. PubMed ID: 27495933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.