133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36748217)
1. Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Still a Gold Standard to Detect Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
Su X; Wang S
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(14):1643-1655. PubMed ID: 36748217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does PET scan have any role in the diagnosis of perineural spread associated with the head and neck tumors?
Nie X; Zhou J; Zeng J; Sun J; Chen W; Niu J
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2022 Aug; 31(8):827-835. PubMed ID: 35467086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(3):1-55. PubMed ID: 23074406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes.
Benndorf M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 20707656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.
Warner E; Messersmith H; Causer P; Eisen A; Shumak R; Plewes D
Ann Intern Med; 2008 May; 148(9):671-9. PubMed ID: 18458280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of combined dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Tang M; Min Z; Lu J; Lei X; Zhang X
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):651-60. PubMed ID: 26275624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the applicability of BI-RADS® MRI for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
Travieso-Aja MM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Luzardo OP
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2019; 61(6):477-488. PubMed ID: 31262509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Xiang W; Rao H; Zhou L
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Jun; 11(6):1423-1432. PubMed ID: 32233072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Value of Nineteen Different Imaging Methods for Patients with Breast Cancer: a Network Meta-Analysis.
Zhang XH; Xiao C
Cell Physiol Biochem; 2018; 46(5):2041-2055. PubMed ID: 29723846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast lesions classified as probably benign (BI-RADS 3) on magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Spick C; Bickel H; Polanec SH; Baltzer PA
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 29168006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of the Diagnostic Values of Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Digital Breast Tomosynthesis,and Digital Mammography for Early Breast Cancer].
Xu AQ; Weng XB; Zheng J; Li ZQ; Wang XL; Zhang SJ
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2019 Oct; 41(5):667-672. PubMed ID: 31699198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Subclassification of BI-RADS 4 Magnetic Resonance Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Li J; Zheng H; Cai W; Wang Y; Zhang H; Liao M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(6):914-920. PubMed ID: 33196599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast as a problem-solving method: to be or not to be?
Oztekin PS; Kosar PN
Breast J; 2014; 20(6):622-31. PubMed ID: 25200378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporating diffusion-weighted imaging in a diagnostic algorithm for multiparametric MR mammography.
Vassiou K; Fanariotis M; Tsougos I; Fezoulidis I
Acta Radiol; 2022 Oct; 63(10):1332-1343. PubMed ID: 34605311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
