132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36748679)
1. [The digital impression under rubber dam: clinical insights for an accurate scan].
Gerdolle D; Browett S; Gresnigt MMM
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2023 Feb; 130(2):73-79. PubMed ID: 36748679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital scanning under rubber dam: An innovative method for making definitive impressions in fixed prosthodontics.
Henarejos-Domingo V; Clavijo V; Blasi Á; Madeira S; Roig M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Oct; 33(7):976-981. PubMed ID: 34008328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoral Scanning with Rubber Dam Isolation in Place for Fabrication of a Chairside Computer-assisted Design and Computer-assisted Manufacture Ceramic Restoration.
Jurado CA; Lederman R; Cohen J; Tsujimoto A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):943-946. PubMed ID: 34753849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital scan over dental dam: workflow for successful clinical outcome.
Clavijo V; Duart E S
Quintessence Int; 2021 Jul; 52(8):660-665. PubMed ID: 34076378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Crowns Made by Different Impression Methods: A Literature Review.
Memari Y; Mohajerfar M; Armin A; Kamalian F; Rezayani V; Beyabanaki E
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e536-e544. PubMed ID: 29679423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT.
Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical study comparing digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: A crossover clinical trial.
Lee SJ; Jamjoom FZ; Le T; Radics A; Gallucci GO
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; 128(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 33602542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of training on time efficiency and marginal adaptation of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing crowns among dental students.
Tan YY; Ho TK; Goo CL
Eur J Dent Educ; 2022 Aug; 26(3):468-474. PubMed ID: 34541757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review.
Ting-Shu S; Jian S
J Prosthodont; 2015 Jun; 24(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 25220390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures.
Sailer I; Benic GI; Fehmer V; Hämmerle CHF; Mühlemann S
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 28024819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Completely digital approach to fabricating a crown under an existing partial removable dental prosthesis by using an intraoral digital scanner in a single appointment.
Lee JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):668-71. PubMed ID: 26809222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accelerated techniques for a post and core and a crown restoration with intraoral digital scanners and CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping.
Lee JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1024-9. PubMed ID: 24951388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using digital technology to enhance restorative dentistry.
Fasbinder D
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2012 Oct; 33(9):666-8, 670, 672 passim. PubMed ID: 23030729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions.
Tamim H; Skjerven H; Ekfeldt A; Rønold HJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 25010876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
