These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36748681)

  • 1. [Deep Margin Elevation for adhesive indirect restorations].
    Bresser RA; Cune MS; Gresnigt MMM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2023 Feb; 130(2):85-88. PubMed ID: 36748681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep margin elevation. A case report study.
    Bresser RA; Naves LZ; van der Made SAM; Cune MS; Gresnigt MMM
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2023 May; 18(2):142-160. PubMed ID: 37166769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach.
    Veneziani M
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2010; 5(1):50-76. PubMed ID: 20305873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical margin relocation in indirect adhesive restorations: A literature review.
    Juloski J; Köken S; Ferrari M
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):273-280. PubMed ID: 29153552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Deep Margin Elevations, clinical considerations].
    Huddleston Slater JJR
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2023 Oct; 130(10):409-414. PubMed ID: 37814835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial.
    Ferrari M; Koken S; Grandini S; Ferrari Cagidiaco E; Joda T; Discepoli N
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():70-76. PubMed ID: 29061380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restoring proximal cavities of molars using the proximal box elevation technique: Systematic review and report of a case.
    Kielbassa AM; Philipp F
    Quintessence Int; 2015 Oct; 46(9):751-64. PubMed ID: 26159213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep margin elevation-Present status and future directions.
    Eggmann F; Ayub JM; Conejo J; Blatz MB
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Jan; 35(1):26-47. PubMed ID: 36602272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of restorations with self-etch adhesive and nanofilled composite in class I and class II cavities.
    Manchorova NA; Vladimirov SB; Donencheva ZK; Drashkovich IS; Manolov SK; Todorova VI
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2008; 50(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 18543788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deep margin elevation in restorative dentistry: A scoping review.
    Taylor A; Burns L
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105066. PubMed ID: 38740249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indirect posterior restorations using a new chairside microhybrid resin composite system.
    Tay FR; Wei SH
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 11317389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resin composites in minimally invasive dentistry.
    Jacobsen T
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2004; 2 Suppl 1():307-11. PubMed ID: 15646590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study.
    Schuckar M; Geurtsen W
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Bonding Parameters on the Clinical Outcome of Tooth-colored Cervical Restorations.
    Mahn E; Rousson V; Heintze S
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):391-403. PubMed ID: 26525003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.