164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36749394)
1. The role of transcorporal cuff placement in high-risk and ultra-high-risk patients: are they actually helpful?
Kurtzman JT; Kerr P; Blum R; Han DS; Baas W; Argade S; Brandes SB
World J Urol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):879-884. PubMed ID: 36749394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter cuffs are similar to larger cuffs.
McKibben MJ; Shakir N; Fuchs JS; Scott JM; Morey AF
BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):335-341. PubMed ID: 30007096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion Heat Map Shows Similar Anatomical Characteristics for Transcorporal and Standard Approach.
Ortiz NM; Wolfe AR; Baumgarten AS; Ward EE; VanDyke ME; Hudak SJ; Morey AF
J Urol; 2020 Nov; 204(5):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 32459559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter implantation as a salvage surgical procedure for challenging cases of male stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and functional outcomes in a contemporary series.
Wiedemann L; Cornu JN; Haab E; Peyrat L; Beley S; Cathelineau X; Haab F
BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1163-8. PubMed ID: 24053170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy.
Guralnick ML; Miller E; Toh KL; Webster GD
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2075-8; discussion 2079. PubMed ID: 11956443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcorporal vs. bulbar artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients with fragile urethra.
El-Akri M; Bentellis I; Tricard T; Brierre T; Cousin T; Dupuis H; Hermieu N; Gaillard V; Poussot B; Robin D; Pitout A; Beraud F; Bertrand-Leon P; Chevallier D; Bruyere F; Biardeau X; Monsaint H; Corbel L; Saussine C; Hermieu JF; Lecoanet P; Capon G; Cornu JN; Game X; Ruffion A; Peyronnet B
World J Urol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):4449-4457. PubMed ID: 34272596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early Revision after Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Does Not Impair the Long-Term Treatment Success.
Sayedahmed K; Rosenhammer B; Burger M; Goßler C
Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34289484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-erosive urethral perforation between tandem artificial urinary sphincter cuffs.
Baumgartner TS; Hudak SJ
Can J Urol; 2016 Apr; 23(2):8240-2. PubMed ID: 27085831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial urinary sphincter revision for urethral atrophy: Comparing single cuff downsizing and tandem cuff placement.
Linder BJ; Viers BR; Ziegelmann MJ; Rivera ME; Elliott DS
Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 28128901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small intestinal submucosa urethral wrap at the time of artificial urinary sphincter placement as a salvage treatment option for patients with persistent/recurrent incontinence following multiple prior sphincter failures and erosions.
Trost L; Elliott D
Urology; 2012 Apr; 79(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 22119252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation.
Sayedahmed K; Olianas R; Kaftan B; Omar M; El Shazly M; Burger M; Mayr R; Rosenhammer B
World J Urol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):183-191. PubMed ID: 30980093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter in radiated and non - radiated compromised urethra. Assessment with a minimum 2 year follow-up.
Le Long E; Rebibo JD; Nouhaud FX; Grise P
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(3):494-500. PubMed ID: 27286112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of urethral atrophy after implantation of artificial urinary sphincter: what are the weaknesses?
Heah NH; Tan RBW
Asian J Androl; 2020; 22(1):60-63. PubMed ID: 31736473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Gullwing Technique: A Novel Method of Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement for the Fragile Urethra.
Vasan R; Myrga J; Miller D; Patnaik S; Morrill C; Rusilko P
Urology; 2022 Nov; 169():237-240. PubMed ID: 35843352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy.
Zheng DC; Xie MK; Bao JW; Yao HJ; Wang Z
J Vis Exp; 2022 Jun; (184):. PubMed ID: 35781527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dorsolateral fibromuscular tissue preservation during artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with low infection and erosion rates.
Cheung F; Fathollahi A; Vertosick E; Jarvis TR; Katz D; Sandhu JS
BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):328-334. PubMed ID: 29972627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 3.5 cm and transcorporal cuffs in high-risk artificial urinary sphincter populations.
Davenport MT; Akhtar AM; Shakir NA; Baumgarten AS; Yi YA; Bergeson RL; Ward EE; Morey AF
Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Feb; 9(1):62-66. PubMed ID: 32055468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do larger cuff sizes with artificial urinary sphincter placement increase the risk of leakage after placement?
Otis-Chapados S; de Los Reyes T; Mousa A; Fervaha G; Radomski SB
Can J Urol; 2023 Feb; 30(1):11419-11423. PubMed ID: 36779948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is Risk of Artificial Urethral Sphincter Cuff Erosion Higher in Patients with Penile Prosthesis?
Sundaram V; Cordon BH; Hofer MD; Morey AF
J Sex Med; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1432-1437. PubMed ID: 27555513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of Urethroplasty to Treat Urethral Strictures Arising From Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosions and Rates of Subsequent Device Replacement.
Keihani S; Chandrapal JC; Peterson AC; Broghammer JA; Chertack N; Elliott SP; Rourke KF; Alsikafi NF; Buckley JC; Breyer BN; Smith TG; Voelzke BB; Zhao LC; Brant WO; Myers JB;
Urology; 2017 Sep; 107():239-245. PubMed ID: 28624554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
