These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36749434)
1. Variability Among Breast Cancer Risk Classification Models When Applied at the Level of the Individual Woman. Paige JS; Lee CI; Wang PC; Hsu W; Brentnall AR; Hoyt AC; Naeim A; Elmore JG J Gen Intern Med; 2023 Aug; 38(11):2584-2592. PubMed ID: 36749434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: a validation study. Terry MB; Liao Y; Whittemore AS; Leoce N; Buchsbaum R; Zeinomar N; Dite GS; Chung WK; Knight JA; Southey MC; Milne RL; Goldgar D; Giles GG; McLachlan SA; Friedlander ML; Weideman PC; Glendon G; Nesci S; Andrulis IL; John EM; Phillips KA; Daly MB; Buys SS; Hopper JL; MacInnis RJ Lancet Oncol; 2019 Apr; 20(4):504-517. PubMed ID: 30799262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance. Quante AS; Whittemore AS; Shriver T; Strauch K; Terry MB Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R144. PubMed ID: 23127309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of breast cancer risk assessment tools on a French-Canadian population-based cohort. Jantzen R; Payette Y; de Malliard T; Labbé C; Noisel N; Broët P BMJ Open; 2021 Apr; 11(4):e045078. PubMed ID: 33846154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk. van Ravesteyn NT; Miglioretti DL; Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Buist DS; Huang H; Heijnsdijk EA; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Near AM; Kerlikowske K; Nelson HD; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(9):609-17. PubMed ID: 22547470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk. Lee JM; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Smith RA; Henderson LM; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL JAMA Intern Med; 2019 May; 179(5):658-667. PubMed ID: 30882843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of Breast Cancer Risk-Assessment Models in a Large Mammography Cohort. McCarthy AM; Guan Z; Welch M; Griffin ME; Sippo DA; Deng Z; Coopey SB; Acar A; Semine A; Parmigiani G; Braun D; Hughes KS J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 May; 112(5):489-497. PubMed ID: 31556450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies. Mandelblatt JS; Stout NK; Schechter CB; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Krapcho M; Trentham-Dietz A; Munoz D; Lee SJ; Berry DA; van Ravesteyn NT; Alagoz O; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Near AM; Hoeffken A; Chang Y; Heijnsdijk EA; Chisholm G; Huang X; Huang H; Ergun MA; Gangnon R; Sprague BL; Plevritis S; Feuer E; de Koning HJ; Cronin KA Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26756606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Nelson HD; Pappas M; Cantor A; Griffin J; Daeges M; Humphrey L Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):256-67. PubMed ID: 26756737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions. Pace LE; Keating NL JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1327-35. PubMed ID: 24691608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Tosteson AN; Sprague BL; Tice JA; Lehman CD; Miglioretti DL; Ann Intern Med; 2015 May; 162(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 25984843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine. Autier P; Boniol M Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening. McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]