These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36749441)

  • 1. Accuracy of keyless vs drill-key implant systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery using two guide-hole designs compared to freehand implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Raabe C; Schuetz TS; Chappuis V; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S; Couso-Queiruga E
    Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Feb; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 36749441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of alveolar ridge morphology and guide-hole design on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery with two implant macro-designs: An in vitro study.
    Dulla FA; Couso-Queiruga E; Chappuis V; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S; Raabe C
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104426. PubMed ID: 36652971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of drilling sequence and guide-hole design on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in extraction sockets and healed sites-An in vitro investigation.
    Raabe C; Dulla FA; Yilmaz B; Chappuis V; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Apr; 34(4):320-329. PubMed ID: 36727584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open-sleeve templates for computer-assisted implant surgery at healed or extraction sockets: An in vitro comparison to closed-sleeve guided system and free-hand approach.
    Li J; Meneghetti PC; Galli M; Mendonca G; Chen Z; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jul; 33(7):757-767. PubMed ID: 35578783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: A simulation-based experimental study.
    Sittikornpaiboon P; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Aug; 23(4):635-643. PubMed ID: 34288341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    El Kholy K; Janner SFM; Schimmel M; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30589502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jorba-García A; González-Barnadas A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 33635397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does guided level (fully or partially) influence implant placement accuracy at post-extraction sockets and healed sites? An in vitro study.
    Chen Z; Li J; Ceolin Meneghetti P; Galli M; Mendonça G; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Aug; 26(8):5449-5458. PubMed ID: 35499656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative retrospective study of different surgical guide designs for static computer-assisted implant surgery in posterior single edentulous sites.
    De Souza AB; Kang M; Negreiros WM; El-Rafie K; Finkelman M; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 34587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery.
    Smitkarn P; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Sep; 46(9):949-957. PubMed ID: 31241782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in-vitro analysis of the accuracy of different guided surgery systems - They are not all the same.
    Guentsch A; Bjork J; Saxe R; Han S; Dentino AR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 May; 34(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 36892499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Intraoperative Measuring Guide and Conventional Surgical Guide in Anterior Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.
    Wang Y; Xie C; Fang T; Chen Z; Yu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):277-286. PubMed ID: 36525249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    El Kholy K; Lazarin R; Janner SFM; Faerber K; Buser R; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 31381178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Anchor-Guiding Sleeve Length on the Accuracy of Computer-Guided Flapless Implant Surgery.
    Dusmukhamedov S; Lee C; Jeong SM; Choi BH
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Dec; 48(6):578-583. PubMed ID: 35881817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precision of sleeveless 3D drill guides for insertion of one-piece ceramic implants: a prospective clinical trial.
    Schnutenhaus S; von Koenigsmarck V; Blender S; Ambrosius L; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 29967902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Study on the influence of sleeve height and implant length on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery].
    Wang QF; He ZD; Yu HY; Qiu XH; Wang YY; Han J; Yang J; Sun XD; Li XB; Li ZY; Fan H; Zhang J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):902-907. PubMed ID: 33171566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position among freehand implant placement, static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: a non-randomized prospective study.
    Jaemsuwan S; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 52(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 35752531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The implant position accuracy between using only surgical drill guide and surgical drill guide with implant guide in fully digital workflow: a randomized clinical trial.
    Ngamprasertkit C; Aunmeungthong W; Khongkhunthian P
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 26(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 34164754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sleeveless guided implant placement compared to conventional approaches: An in vitro study at healed sites and fresh extraction sockets.
    Galli M; Mendonça G; Meneghetti P; Bekkali M; Travan S; Wang HL; Li J
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2023 May; 16(2):117-132. PubMed ID: 37158181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.