138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36749752)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in China.
Lin J; Fang Q; Zheng X
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281402. PubMed ID: 36749752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Remák E; Charbonneau C; Négrier S; Kim ST; Motzer RJ
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(24):3995-4000. PubMed ID: 18711190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Sunitinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Wan X; Zhang Y; Tan C; Zeng X; Peng L
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Apr; 5(4):491-496. PubMed ID: 30789633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First-Line Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A United States-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Zhu Y; Liu K; Ding D; Peng L
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2023 Jun; 21(3):417.e1-417.e10. PubMed ID: 36529626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib as First-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma from an Italian National Health Service Perspective.
Capri S; Porta C; Delea TE
Clin Ther; 2017 Mar; 39(3):567-580.e2. PubMed ID: 28189363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An updated cost-effectiveness analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Italy.
Capri S; Porta C; Condorelli C; Premoli E; Khare A; Kalra M; Modi N; Ratto B
J Med Econ; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 33079593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib in First-Line Intermediate- to Poor-Risk Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Reinhorn D; Sarfaty M; Leshno M; Moore A; Neiman V; Rosenbaum E; Goldstein DA
Oncologist; 2019 Mar; 24(3):366-371. PubMed ID: 30710066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic evaluation of first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma in China.
Wang H; Wang Y; Li L; Zhou H; Lili S; Li L; Yike S; Aixia M
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():954264. PubMed ID: 36159269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sunitinib versus Interferon-Alfa for First-Line Treatment of Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Singapore.
Pruis SL; Aziz MIA; Pearce F; Tan MH; Wu DB; Ng K
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019 Jan; 35(2):126-133. PubMed ID: 30854989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic evaluation of everolimus versus sorafenib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of first-line sunitinib.
Casciano R; Chulikavit M; Di Lorenzo G; Liu Z; Baladi JF; Wang X; Robertson J; Garrison L
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):846-51. PubMed ID: 21914504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of sunitinib as first-line targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Spain.
Calvo Aller E; Maroto P; Kreif N; González Larriba JL; López-Brea M; Castellano D; Martí B; Díaz Cerezo S
Clin Transl Oncol; 2011 Dec; 13(12):869-77. PubMed ID: 22126730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anlotinib Versus Sunitinib as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial.
Zhou AP; Bai Y; Song Y; Luo H; Ren XB; Wang X; Shi B; Fu C; Cheng Y; Liu J; Qin S; Li J; Li H; Bai X; Ye D; Wang J; Ma J
Oncologist; 2019 Aug; 24(8):e702-e708. PubMed ID: 30902918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of everolimus for second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Serbia.
Mihajlović J; Pechlivanoglou P; Sabo A; Tomić Z; Postma MJ
Clin Ther; 2013 Dec; 35(12):1909-22. PubMed ID: 24238790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic evaluation of sunitinib versus pazopanib and best supportive care for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Chile: cost-effectiveness analysis and a mixed treatment comparison.
Vargas C; Balmaceda C; Rodríguez F; Rojas R; Giglio A; Espinoza MA
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Oct; 19(5):609-617. PubMed ID: 30758237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate in second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Finland.
Purmonen T; Martikainen JA; Soini EJ; Kataja V; Vuorinen RL; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
Clin Ther; 2008 Feb; 30(2):382-92. PubMed ID: 18343276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-utility of Sunitinib Versus Pazopanib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Canada using Real-world Evidence.
Nazha S; Tanguay S; Kapoor A; Jewett M; Kollmannsberger C; Wood L; Bjarnason GAG; Heng D; Soulières D; Reaume MN; Basappa N; Lévesque E; Dragomir A
Clin Drug Investig; 2018 Dec; 38(12):1155-1165. PubMed ID: 30267257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the United Kingdom.
Amdahl J; Diaz J; Sharma A; Park J; Chandiwana D; Delea TE
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0175920. PubMed ID: 28636648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the U.S.
Ding D; Hu H; Shi Y; She L; Yao L; Zhu Y; Zeng S; Shen L; Huang J
Oncologist; 2021 Feb; 26(2):e290-e297. PubMed ID: 32918790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential health gains for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in daily clinical practice: A real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential first- and second-line treatments.
De Groot S; Blommestein HM; Redekop WK; Sleijfer S; Kiemeney LALM; Oosterwijk E; Uyl-de Groot CA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177364. PubMed ID: 28531203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib as a third-line or further treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Zhu Q; Ni R; Guan X
Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2023 Aug; 12(8):1782-1789. PubMed ID: 37691869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
