158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36750522)
1. Item selection methods in multidimensional computerized adaptive testing for forced-choice items using Thurstonian IRT model.
Wang Q; Zheng Y; Liu K; Cai Y; Peng S; Tu D
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):600-614. PubMed ID: 36750522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive testing with the GGUM-RANK multidimensional forced choice model: Comparison of pair, triplet, and tetrad scoring.
Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Apr; 52(2):761-772. PubMed ID: 31342469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.
Frick S; Brown A; Wetzel E
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 34464217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating and Using Block Information in the Thurstonian IRT Model.
Frick S
Psychometrika; 2023 Dec; 88(4):1556-1589. PubMed ID: 37640828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomously Scored Items.
Tu D; Han Y; Cai Y; Gao X
Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Nov; 42(8):677-694. PubMed ID: 30559574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multidimensional Forced-Choice CAT With Dominance Items: An Empirical Comparison With Optimal Static Testing Under Different Desirability Matching.
Lin Y; Brown A; Williams P
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):322-350. PubMed ID: 36866068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dual process item response theory model for polytomous multidimensional forced-choice items.
Qiu X; de la Torre J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):491-512. PubMed ID: 36967236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review.
Nie L; Xu P; Hu D
Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(5):e26884. PubMed ID: 38449643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model.
Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):241-261. PubMed ID: 34370564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adapting cognitive diagnosis computerized adaptive testing item selection rules to traditional item response theory.
Sorrel MA; Barrada JR; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227196. PubMed ID: 31923227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A LASSO-Based Method for Detecting Item-Trait Patterns of Replenished Items in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.
Sun J; Ye Z
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1944. PubMed ID: 31543847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.
Bürkner PC; Schulte N; Holling H
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):827-854. PubMed ID: 31488915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
Lee H; Smith WZ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Joint modeling of the two-alternative multidimensional forced-choice personality measurement and its response time by a Thurstonian D-diffusion item response model.
Bunji K; Okada K
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1091-1107. PubMed ID: 32394181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multidimensional Test Assembly Using Mixed-Integer Linear Programming: An Application of Kullback-Leibler Information.
Debeer D; van Rijn PW; Ali US
Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jan; 44(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 31853156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multidimensional CAT Item Selection Methods for Domain Scores and Composite Scores: Theory and Applications.
Yao L
Psychometrika; 2012 Jul; 77(3):495-523. PubMed ID: 27519778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Item Response Theory.
Luo H; Wang D; Guo Z; Cai Y; Tu D
Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jun; 46(4):288-302. PubMed ID: 35601262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What Information Works Best?: A Comparison of Routing Methods.
Sari HI; Raborn A
Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Sep; 42(6):499-515. PubMed ID: 30787490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Lognormal Ipsative Model for Multidimensional Compositional Items.
Chen CW; Wang WC; Mok MMC; Scherer R
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():573252. PubMed ID: 34712161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can High-Dimensional Questionnaires Resolve the Ipsativity Issue of Forced-Choice Response Formats?
Schulte N; Holling H; Bürkner PC
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):262-289. PubMed ID: 37929263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
