129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3675072)
1. Improvement in semen quality using glass bead column.
Daya S; Gwatkin RB
Arch Androl; 1987; 18(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 3675072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glass wool column filtration of human semen: relation to swim-up procedure and outcome of IVF.
van der Ven HH; Jeyendran RS; Al-Hasani S; Tünnerhoff A; Hoebbel K; Diedrich K; Krebs D; Perez-Pelaez M
Hum Reprod; 1988 Jan; 3(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 3350941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Separation of motile human spermatozoa by means of a glass bead column.
Daya S; Gwatkin RB; Bissessar H
Gamete Res; 1987 Aug; 17(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 3507359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of matrix filtration of low-quality boar semen doses on sperm quality.
Bussalleu E; Pinart E; Rivera MM; Briz M; Sancho S; Yeste M; Casas I; Fàbrega A; Rigau T; Rodriguez-Gil JE; Bonet S
Reprod Domest Anim; 2009 Jun; 44(3):499-503. PubMed ID: 19192214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sperm preparation through Sephadex
Husna AU; Azam A; Qadeer S; Awan MA; Nasreen S; Shahzad Q; Fouladi-Nashta A; Khalid M; Akhter S
Reprod Domest Anim; 2018 Apr; 53(2):377-384. PubMed ID: 29239046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glass-bead column separation of motile and nonmotile human spermatozoa.
Lechtzin N; Garside W; Heyner S; Hillman N
J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf; 1991 Apr; 8(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 2061686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between swim-up and glass bead column techniques for the separation of human spermatozoa.
Calamera JC; Quiros MC; Brugo S; Nicholson RF
Andrologia; 1991; 23(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 1772137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concentration of viable spermatozoa for artificial insemination.
Jeyendran RS; Perez-Pelaez M; Crabo BG
Fertil Steril; 1986 Jan; 45(1):132-4. PubMed ID: 3943644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glass wool column filtration: effects on motility, viability, and fertilizing ability of epididymal spermatozoa from mice.
Kholkute SD; Rodriguez J; Rawlins RG; Dukelow WR
Lab Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 44(5):537-9. PubMed ID: 7844969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative analysis of sperm selection procedures prior to cryopreservation for Nili-Ravi buffalo bull (Bubalus bubalis) semen-: Assessment of its impact on post-thaw sperm functional quality.
Husna AU; Ejaz R; Qadeer S; Azam A; Rakha BA; Ansari MS; Shahzad Q; Javed M; Vazquez-Levin MH; Akhter S
Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Nov; 174():29-36. PubMed ID: 27616354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of the quality and fertilizing capacity of boar semen frozen in 0.25 ml straws.
Peláez J; Breininger E; Alegre B; Peña FJ; Domínguez JC
Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Apr; 41(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 16519722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Glass wool column filtration, an advantageous way of preparing semen samples for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an auto-controlled randomized study.
Van den Bergh M; Revelard P; Bertrand E; Biramane J; Vanin AS; Englert Y
Hum Reprod; 1997 Mar; 12(3):509-13. PubMed ID: 9130752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Freezability of equine semen after glass beads column separation.
Klinc P; Kosec M; Majdic G
Equine Vet J; 2005 Jan; 37(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 15651733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of sperm characteristics in predicting the in vitro fertilizing capacity of semen.
Comhaire FH; Vermeulen L; Hinting A; Schoonjans F
J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf; 1988 Dec; 5(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 3221124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preparation of oligozoospermic and/or asthenozoospermic semen for intrauterine insemination using the SpermPrep semen filtration column.
Ohashi K; Saji F; Wakimoto A; Kato M; Tsutsui T; Tanizawa O
Fertil Steril; 1992 Apr; 57(4):866-70. PubMed ID: 1313377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The male factor in fertilization of rat eggs in vitro.
Shalgi R; Kaplan R; Nebel L; Kraicer PF
J Exp Zool; 1981 Sep; 217(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 7338716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glass wool filtration of bull cryopreserved semen: a rapid and effective method to obtain a high percentage of functional sperm.
Arzondo MM; Caballero JN; Marín-Briggiler CI; Dalvit G; Cetica PD; Vazquez-Levin MH
Theriogenology; 2012 Jul; 78(1):201-9. PubMed ID: 22537998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glass wool column filtration versus mini-Percoll gradient for processing poor quality semen samples.
Johnson DE; Confino E; Jeyendran RS
Fertil Steril; 1996 Sep; 66(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 8751748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enrichment of high-quality spermatozoa in bovine semen: relative effectiveness of three filtration matrixes.
Cisale HO; Fischman ML; Blasi CD; Fernandez HA; Gledhill BL
Andrologia; 2001 May; 33(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 11380329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
