150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36750809)
1. A novel maxillary transverse deficiency diagnostic method based on ideal teeth position.
Ma T; Wang YH; Zhang CX; Liu DX
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):82. PubMed ID: 36750809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of transverse maxillomandibular discrepancy and dental compensation in early mixed dentition with skeletal Class III malocclusion without posterior crossbite.
Liu F; Huang H; Shi X; Liu Y; Liu D
PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0287343. PubMed ID: 37319305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary transverse deficiency diagnosed by 3 methods and its relationship with molar angulation in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Zhang C; Guo Q; Liu W; Tang Y; Yuan R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 36813651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional analysis of posterior tooth inclinations in transverse and sagittal relationships: A cross-sectional study.
de Oliveira E Silva G; Mendes TS; Carneiro DPA; Menezes CC; Vedovello SAS; Terossi de Godoi AP
Int Orthod; 2024 Mar; 22(1):100824. PubMed ID: 37992474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of buccal and lingual alveolar bone thickness and buccolingual inclination of maxillary posterior teeth in patients with severe skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.
Hu X; Huang X; Gu Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr; 157(4):503-515. PubMed ID: 32241357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transverse implications of maxillary premolar extraction in Class III presurgical orthodontic treatment.
Lee SJ; Kim TW; Nahm DS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):740-8. PubMed ID: 16769492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of Interarch Width Ratio to measure Transverse Relationship: A New Method to measure and assess Interarch Discrepancy.
Batwa W; Baeshen HA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 29807960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base width in Class III malocclusions with low, average and high MP-SN angles.
Chen F; Terada K; Wu L; Saito I
Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 17029532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional evaluation of dentofacial transverse widths in adults with different sagittal facial patterns.
Hwang S; Song J; Lee J; Choi YJ; Chung CJ; Kim KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):365-374. PubMed ID: 30173839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion.
Shu R; Han X; Wang Y; Xu H; Ai D; Wang L; Wu Y; Bai D
Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 23458279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis among malocclusion classes in a Japanese orthodontic population.
Ota S; Hirakata C; Endo T
J Oral Sci; 2019 Nov; 61(4):504-507. PubMed ID: 31548453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a maxillomandibular arch form based on the center of resistance of teeth using cone-beam computed tomography.
Moon HW; Nam W; Ahn HW; Oh SH; Kook YA; Kim SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 34753591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transverse dental compensation in relation to sagittal and transverse skeletal discrepancies in skeletal Class III patients.
Ahn J; Kim SJ; Lee JY; Chung CJ; Kim KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):148-156. PubMed ID: 28024769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transverse Ridge of Premolars and Oblique Ridge of Maxillary Molars are in Divine Golden Ratio.
Sarode SC; Maniyar N; Sarode GS; Yerwadekar S; Shetty R; Gadbail AR; Gondivkar S; Anand R; Patil S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 May; 21(5):486-489. PubMed ID: 32690828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonsurgical maxillary orthopedic protraction treatment for an adult patient with hyperdivergent facial morphology, Class III malocclusion, and bilateral crossbite.
Hollander Z; Fraser A; Paredes N; Bui J; Chen Y; Moon W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Aug; 162(2):264-278. PubMed ID: 35534400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal Class III cases.
Ishii H; Morita S; Takeuchi Y; Nakamura S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Oct; 92(4):304-12. PubMed ID: 3477949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes during growth.
Hesby RM; Marshall SD; Dawson DV; Southard KA; Casko JS; Franciscus RG; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17169734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between formation/eruption of maxillary teeth and skeletal pattern of maxilla.
Suda N; Hiyama S; Kuroda T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 11786871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the upper airway and maxillary and mandibular characters in adult skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion].
Mao XY; Yang JY; Li J; Xu R
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Aug; 30(4):419-423. PubMed ID: 34693438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
