These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36752316)

  • 1. Computational models of stimulus equivalence: An intersection for the study of symbolic behavior.
    Tovar ÁE; Torres-Chávez Á; Mofrad AA; Arntzen E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Mar; 119(2):407-425. PubMed ID: 36752316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emergent stimulus relations depend on stimulus correlation and not on reinforcement contingencies.
    Minster ST; Elliffe D; Muthukumaraswamy SD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 May; 95(3):327-42. PubMed ID: 21547070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling relational responding with artificial neural networks.
    Mendoza J; Ghirlanda S
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104816. PubMed ID: 36584963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between differential stimulus relatedness and implicit measure effect sizes.
    Cummins J; Roche B; Tyndall I; Cartwright A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jul; 110(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 29774561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Emergence of Stimulus Relations: Human and Computer Learning.
    Ninness C; Ninness SK; Rumph M; Lawson D
    Perspect Behav Sci; 2018 Jun; 41(1):121-154. PubMed ID: 32004361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational Simulation of Equivalence Class Formation Using the go/no-go Procedure with Compound Stimuli.
    Vernucio RR; Debert P
    Psychol Rec; 2016; 66():439-449. PubMed ID: 27512235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of conditional and equivalence relations without differential consequences.
    Harrison RJ; Green G
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Nov; 54(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 2103583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures.
    Saunders RR; Wachter J; Spradlin JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):95-115. PubMed ID: 3346622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons.
    Lionello-DeNolf KM; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):467-95. PubMed ID: 12507015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reflexivity in pigeons.
    Sweeney MM; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Nov; 94(3):267-82. PubMed ID: 21541171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Children's emergent relations of equivalence using stimuli with opposite verbal labels: Exclusion and minimal training conditions.
    Schenk JJ; Keenan M; Boelens HH; Dymond S; Smeets PM
    Behav Processes; 2021 Apr; 185():104341. PubMed ID: 33545321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability of functional equivalence and stimulus equivalence: effects of baseline reversals.
    Wirth O; Chase PN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jan; 77(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 11831781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Formation of new stimulus equivalence classes by exclusion.
    Plazas EA; Villamil CW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):380-393. PubMed ID: 29509271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Neurocomputational Approach to Trained and Transitive Relations in Equivalence Classes.
    Tovar ÁE; Westermann G
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1848. PubMed ID: 29093696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generalization of cross-modal stimulus equivalence classes: operant processes as components in human category formation.
    Lane SD; Clow JK; Innis A; Critchfield TS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Nov; 70(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 9821680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contextual control of stimulus generalization and stimulus equivalence in hierarchical categorization.
    Griffee K; Dougher MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):433-47. PubMed ID: 12507013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Equivalence Projective Simulation as a Framework for Modeling Formation of Stimulus Equivalence Classes.
    Mofrad AA; Yazidi A; Hammer HL; Arntzen E
    Neural Comput; 2020 May; 32(5):912-968. PubMed ID: 32186999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Naming in conditional discrimination and stimulus equivalence.
    Saunders KJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 May; 51(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 2498454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An overview of key papers preceding Sidman equivalence.
    Arntzen E; Saetherbakken PS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Jan; 115(1):224-241. PubMed ID: 33369750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rational-emotive behavior therapy and the formation of stimulus equivalence classes.
    Plaud JJ; Gaither GA; Weller LA; Bigwood SJ; Barth J; von Duvillard SP
    J Clin Psychol; 1998 Aug; 54(5):597-610. PubMed ID: 9696110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.