136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36753053)
1. International, prospective cohort study comparing non-absorbable versus absorbable sutures for skin surgery: CANVAS service evaluation.
Lee A; Stanley GHM; Wade RG; Berwick D; Vinicombe V; Salence BK; Musbahi E; De Poli ARCS; Savu M; Batchelor JM; Abbott RA; Gardiner MD; Wernham A; Veitch D;
Br J Surg; 2023 Mar; 110(4):462-470. PubMed ID: 36753053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.
Wade RG; Wormald JC; Figus A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 2(2):CD011757. PubMed ID: 29390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
Poprzeczny AJ; Grivell RM; Louise J; Deussen AR; Dodd JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
Irvin TT; Koffman CG; Duthie HL
Br J Surg; 1976 Oct; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.
Goto S; Sakamoto T; Ganeko R; Hida K; Furukawa TA; Sakai Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012124. PubMed ID: 32271475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal primary wound closure methods after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Davey MG; Browne F; Davey MS; Walsh SR; Kerin MJ; Lowery AJ
BJS Open; 2023 Jan; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 36821724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quill barbed sutures in body contouring surgery: a 6-year comparison with running absorbable braided sutures.
Hurwitz DJ; Reuben B
Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Sep; 33(3 Suppl):44S-56S. PubMed ID: 24084879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Evaluation of Fascial Closure Techniques in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: Practice Patterns and Short-Term Outcomes.
Fox SS; Huang LC; Hooks WB; Fischer JP; Hope WW
Am Surg; 2019 Nov; 85(11):1213-1218. PubMed ID: 31775961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.
Sah AP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2019-27. PubMed ID: 25631171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of skin closure by using mattress sutures or intracutaneous absorbable sutures after the Karydakis flap surgery because of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. A comparative analysis.
Ekici U; Ferhatoglu MF
Ann Ital Chir; 2019; 90():474-479. PubMed ID: 31158103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dermatological surgery: an update on suture materials and techniques. Part 1.
Ashraf I; Butt E; Veitch D; Wernham A
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2021 Dec; 46(8):1400-1410. PubMed ID: 34056751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra-Dermal Absorbable Suture in the Groin Incision Associated with Less Groin Surgical Site Infections than Trans-Dermal Sutures in Vascular Surgical Patients.
Nikulainen V; Helmiö P; Hurme S; Hakovirta H
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2019 Jan; 20(1):45-48. PubMed ID: 30300081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the Risk of Infection Lower with Sutures than with Staples for Skin Closure After Orthopaedic Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.
Krishnan RJ; Crawford EJ; Syed I; Kim P; Rampersaud YR; Martin J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):922-937. PubMed ID: 30958392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Staples equal sutures for skin closure after soft tissue tumor resection.
Moore DC; Sellers MH; Archer KR; Schwartz HS; Holt GE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Mar; 471(3):899-904. PubMed ID: 22903280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis.
Smith TO; Sexton D; Mann C; Donell S
BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1199. PubMed ID: 20234041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
