These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36754011)
1. The US Supreme Court and Future of Financing Dialysis Care. Worsley ML; Erickson KF Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):273-275. PubMed ID: 36754011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Access to health care for millions in the balance as US Supreme Court reviews federal subsidies for insurance. Gostin LO JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):454. PubMed ID: 25647191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. US Supreme Court will hear challenge to Obamacare subsidies. McCarthy M BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6730. PubMed ID: 25384501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US Supreme Court makes historic health ruling. Jaffe S Lancet; 2012 Jul; 380(9836):14. PubMed ID: 22779087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Searching for clues on how the Supreme Court would rule on subsidies. Carlson J Mod Healthc; 2014 Jul; 44(30):9-10. PubMed ID: 25181804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The courts and elective abortions under Medicaid. Mendelson JE; Domolky S Soc Serv Rev; 1980 Mar; 54(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 10297796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles. Noonan JT Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Unraveling Obamacare--can Congress and the Supreme Court undo health care reform? Oberlander J N Engl J Med; 2014 Dec; 371(26):2445-7. PubMed ID: 25493977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Gramm-Rudman-Hollings and the Supreme Court decision. Provider; 1986 Sep; 12(9):39-40. PubMed ID: 10301048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Barnett BA Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Washington reins in the dialysis business. Fisher AB Fortune; 1983 Jul; 108(2):66-9. PubMed ID: 10260851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Once more into the breach: the future of subsidies in the federal health insurance exchange. Rosenbaum S Milbank Q; 2014 Dec; 92(4):644-7. PubMed ID: 25492596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rust v. Sullivan, and the future of abortion under a more conservative Supreme Court. Browning DA J Med Assoc Ga; 1991 Sep; 80(9):499-501. PubMed ID: 1744530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion. Mahoney HM America (NY); 1993 Oct; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]