These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36754011)

  • 1. The US Supreme Court and Future of Financing Dialysis Care.
    Worsley ML; Erickson KF
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):273-275. PubMed ID: 36754011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Access to health care for millions in the balance as US Supreme Court reviews federal subsidies for insurance.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):454. PubMed ID: 25647191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US Supreme Court will hear challenge to Obamacare subsidies.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6730. PubMed ID: 25384501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US Supreme Court makes historic health ruling.
    Jaffe S
    Lancet; 2012 Jul; 380(9836):14. PubMed ID: 22779087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Searching for clues on how the Supreme Court would rule on subsidies.
    Carlson J
    Mod Healthc; 2014 Jul; 44(30):9-10. PubMed ID: 25181804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The courts and elective abortions under Medicaid.
    Mendelson JE; Domolky S
    Soc Serv Rev; 1980 Mar; 54(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 10297796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles.
    Noonan JT
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unraveling Obamacare--can Congress and the Supreme Court undo health care reform?
    Oberlander J
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Dec; 371(26):2445-7. PubMed ID: 25493977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gramm-Rudman-Hollings and the Supreme Court decision.
    Provider; 1986 Sep; 12(9):39-40. PubMed ID: 10301048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Washington reins in the dialysis business.
    Fisher AB
    Fortune; 1983 Jul; 108(2):66-9. PubMed ID: 10260851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Once more into the breach: the future of subsidies in the federal health insurance exchange.
    Rosenbaum S
    Milbank Q; 2014 Dec; 92(4):644-7. PubMed ID: 25492596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of Hyde Amendment.
    Garn J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Jun; 126(110):S8994-7. PubMed ID: 11664150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rust v. Sullivan, and the future of abortion under a more conservative Supreme Court.
    Browning DA
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1991 Sep; 80(9):499-501. PubMed ID: 1744530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion.
    Mahoney HM
    America (NY); 1993 Oct; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Supreme Court ignites a fiery abortion debate.
    Time; 1977 Jul; 110(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 11663838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obituary for Hill-Burton challenge: U.S. Supreme Court refuses to hear Hill-Burton case.
    Peterson RN
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 May; 7(10):1-3. PubMed ID: 10266519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perspectives. Supreme Court ruling opens Pandora's Box.
    Moskowitz DB
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1991 Jun; 45(23):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10110606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.