These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3675403)

  • 1. A randomised comparison of three drainage systems following cholecystectomy.
    Loder PB; Smith GH; Morris S; Bambach CP; Smith RC
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1987 Aug; 57(8):531-5. PubMed ID: 3675403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of intraperitoneal drainage after cholecystectomy; a prospective ultrasonographic study.
    Kriplani AK; Sawhney S; Kumar S; Kapur BM
    Trop Gastroenterol; 1992; 13(4):146-51. PubMed ID: 1302384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abdominal drainage following cholecystectomy: high, low, or no suction?
    McCormack TT; Abel PD; Collins CD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 Sep; 65(5):326-8. PubMed ID: 6614773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized trial of drainage after cholecystectomy. Suction vaersus static drainage through a main wound versus a stab incision.
    van der Linden W; Gedda S; Edlund G
    Am J Surg; 1981 Feb; 141(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 7006427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomised prospective trial of two drainage methods after cholecystectomy.
    Fraser I; Everson NW; Nash JR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1982 May; 64(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 7081917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Gurusamy KS; Samraj K; Mullerat P; Davidson BR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD006004. PubMed ID: 17636819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Closed-suction versus Penrose drainage after cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized evaluation.
    Sarr MG; Parikh KJ; Minken SL; Zuidema GD; Cameron JL
    Am J Surg; 1987 Apr; 153(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 3551645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suction drainage of the gallbladder bed does not prevent complications after cholecystectomy: a random control clinical trial.
    Playforth MJ; Sauven P; Evans M; Pollock AV
    Br J Surg; 1985 Apr; 72(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 3886068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Passive tube and suction drainage after elective cholecystectomy--a comparison using ultrasonography.
    Brewster NT; King PM; Cunningham C; Adam RD; Griffiths JM
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Oct; 37(5):325-7. PubMed ID: 1479562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cholecystectomy: safe or not safe to drain?
    Mellor SG; Thomas MH; Donnellan BS
    J R Soc Med; 1988 Oct; 81(10):566-8. PubMed ID: 3184087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sump drainage versus static drainage after cholecystectomy.
    van der Linden W; Gedda S; Edlund G
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Jun; 152(6):829-30. PubMed ID: 7244965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple and effective way to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Jorgensen JO; Gillies RB; Hunt DR; Caplehorn JR; Lumley T
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1995 Jul; 65(7):466-9. PubMed ID: 7611964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiency of various types drainage of the peritoneal cavity--an experimental study in man.
    Broomé AE; Hansson LC; Tyger JF
    Acta Chir Scand; 1983; 149(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 6837224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Half versus full vacuum suction drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer- a prospective randomized clinical trial[ISRCTN24484328].
    Chintamani ; Singhal V; Singh J; Bansal A; Saxena S
    BMC Cancer; 2005 Jan; 5():11. PubMed ID: 15676064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two types of vacuum drainage after cholecystectomy.
    Salam IM; McMullin JP; O'Higgins NJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1984 May; 66(3):190-1. PubMed ID: 6721407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suction forces generated by passive bile bag drainage on a model of post-subdural hematoma evacuation.
    Tenny SO; Thorell WE
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2018 Jul; 160(7):1305-1309. PubMed ID: 29728776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Application of closed negative pressure irrigation and suction device in the treatment of high perianal abscess].
    Chen SQ; Liu WC; Zhang ZZ; Lin LY; Chen SM; Huang GL; Lin CZ; Wang L
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 22(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 31054551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of intraperitoneal drains on subhepatic collections following cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical trial.
    Monson JR; MacFie J; Irving H; Keane FB; Brennan TG; Tanner WA
    Br J Surg; 1986 Dec; 73(12):993-4. PubMed ID: 3539256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drainage versus no Drainage after Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Sharma A; Gupta SN
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2016; 14(53):69-72. PubMed ID: 27892445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Translating evidence-based protocol of wound drain management for total joint arthroplasty into practice: A quasi-experimental study.
    Tsang LF; Cheng HC; Ho HS; Hsu YC; Chow CM; Law HW; Fong LC; Leung LM; Kong IC; Chan CW; Sham AS
    Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs; 2016 May; 21():49-61. PubMed ID: 27125971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.