These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36756004)

  • 1. Controlling the familywise error rate in widefield optical neuroimaging of functional connectivity in mice.
    White BR; Chan C; Adepoju T; Shinohara RT; Vandekar S
    Neurophotonics; 2023 Jan; 10(1):015004. PubMed ID: 36756004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates.
    Eklund A; Nichols TE; Knutsson H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(28):7900-5. PubMed ID: 27357684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust spatial extent inference with a semiparametric bootstrap joint inference procedure.
    Vandekar SN; Satterthwaite TD; Xia CH; Adebimpe A; Ruparel K; Gur RC; Gur RE; Shinohara RT
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1145-1155. PubMed ID: 31282994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of random-field-theory and false-discovery-rate inference results in the analysis of registered one-dimensional biomechanical datasets.
    Naouma H; Pataky TC
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e8189. PubMed ID: 31844582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical approaches to temporal and spatial autocorrelation in resting-state functional connectivity in mice measured with optical intrinsic signal imaging.
    White BR; Chan C; Vandekar S; Shinohara RT
    Neurophotonics; 2022 Oct; 9(4):041405. PubMed ID: 35295407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Faster family-wise error control for neuroimaging with a parametric bootstrap.
    Vandekar SN; Satterthwaite TD; Rosen A; Ciric R; Roalf DR; Ruparel K; Gur RC; Gur RE; Shinohara RT
    Biostatistics; 2018 Oct; 19(4):497-513. PubMed ID: 29059370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial nonstationarity of image noise in widefield optical imaging and its effects on cluster-based inference for resting-state functional connectivity.
    White BR; Adepoju TE; Fisher HB; Shinohara RT; Vandekar S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2024 Apr; 404():110076. PubMed ID: 38331258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data.
    Pantazis D; Nichols TE; Baillet S; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(2):383-94. PubMed ID: 15784416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods.
    Hayasaka S; Phan KL; Liberzon I; Worsley KJ; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jun; 22(2):676-87. PubMed ID: 15193596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjusting the neuroimaging statistical inferences for nonstationarity.
    Salimi-Khorshidi G; Smith SM; Nichols TE
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):992-9. PubMed ID: 20426085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of multiple hypothesis testing on reproducibility in neuroimaging research: A simulation study and Python-based software.
    Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2020 May; 337():108654. PubMed ID: 32114144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Many tests of significance: new methods for controlling type I errors.
    Keselman HJ; Miller CW; Holland B
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Dec; 16(4):420-31. PubMed ID: 22040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cluster mass inference via random field theory.
    Zhang H; Nichols TE; Johnson TD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 18805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical testing and power analysis for brain-wide association study.
    Gong W; Wan L; Lu W; Ma L; Cheng F; Cheng W; Grünewald S; Feng J
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Jul; 47():15-30. PubMed ID: 29656107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Faster permutation inference in brain imaging.
    Winkler AM; Ridgway GR; Douaud G; Nichols TE; Smith SM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 141():502-516. PubMed ID: 27288322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlling the false discovery rate with constraints: the Newman-Keuls test revisited.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):136-43. PubMed ID: 17342955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review.
    Nichols T; Hayasaka S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Oct; 12(5):419-46. PubMed ID: 14599004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voxel-based meta-analysis via permutation of subject images (PSI): Theory and implementation for SDM.
    Albajes-Eizagirre A; Solanes A; Vieta E; Radua J
    Neuroimage; 2019 Feb; 186():174-184. PubMed ID: 30389629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Domain selection and familywise error rate for functional data: A unified framework.
    Abramowicz K; Pini A; Schelin L; Sjöstedt de Luna S; Stamm A; Vantini S
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1119-1132. PubMed ID: 35352337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.