BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36757454)

  • 1. Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction.
    Okimoto N; Yasaka K; Kaiume M; Kanemaru N; Suzuki Y; Abe O
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Apr; 48(4):1280-1289. PubMed ID: 36757454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Discordance Between Computed Tomography and Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Major Features.
    Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Law A; Kobi M; Paroder V; Rozenblit AM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):155-161. PubMed ID: 28806321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS.
    Schellhaas B; Hammon M; Strobel D; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Goertz RS; Cavallaro A; Janka R; Neurath MF; Uder M; Seuss H
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Oct; 28(10):4254-4264. PubMed ID: 29675659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Liver MR Imaging versus Multidetector CT in the Detection of Dysplastic Nodules and Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kim BR; Lee JM; Lee DH; Yoon JH; Hur BY; Suh KS; Yi NJ; Lee KB; Han JK
    Radiology; 2017 Oct; 285(1):134-146. PubMed ID: 28609205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018.
    Ludwig DR; Fraum TJ; Cannella R; Ballard DH; Tsai R; Naeem M; LeBlanc M; Salter A; Tsung A; Shetty AS; Borhani AA; Furlan A; Fowler KJ
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jun; 44(6):2116-2132. PubMed ID: 30798397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of Vertebral Mass and Diagnosis of Spinal Cord Compression in Computed Tomography With Deep Learning Reconstruction: Comparison With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction.
    Fujita N; Yasaka K; Watanabe Y; Okimoto N; Konishiike M; Abe O
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2024 May; 75(2):351-358. PubMed ID: 37795610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Added Value of a Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatocyte-phase Image to the LI-RADS System for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Chen N; Motosugi U; Morisaka H; Ichikawa S; Sano K; Ichikawa T; Matsuda M; Fujii H; Onishi H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2016; 15(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 26104079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. LI-RADS v2017 categorisation of HCC using CT: Does moderate to severe fatty liver affect accuracy?
    Kim SS; Hwang JA; Shin HC; Choi SY; Kang TW; Jou SS; Lee WH; Park S; Heo NH
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):186-194. PubMed ID: 30073499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. LI-RADS Version 2018 Targetoid Appearances on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance for the Differentiation of HCC and Non-HCC Malignancy.
    Min JH; Lee MW; Park HS; Lee DH; Park HJ; Lee JE; Park SJ; Kim SS; Park SH; Ha SY; Hwang JA; Cha DI; Park B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):421-432. PubMed ID: 35319906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image Quality and Lesion Detectability of Pancreatic Phase Thin-Slice Computed Tomography Images With a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm.
    Nakamoto A; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Fukui H; Ota T; Ogawa K; Yano K; Kiso K; Honda T; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 47(5):698-703. PubMed ID: 37707398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 in predicting malignant liver lesions in pediatric patients: a preliminary study.
    Ludwig DR; Romberg EK; Fraum TJ; Rohe E; Fowler KJ; Khanna G
    Pediatr Radiol; 2019 May; 49(6):746-758. PubMed ID: 31069473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability, Validity, and Reader Acceptance of LI-RADS-An In-depth Analysis.
    Barth BK; Donati OF; Fischer MA; Ulbrich EJ; Karlo CA; Becker A; Seifert B; Reiner CS
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):1145-53. PubMed ID: 27174029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of deep learning reconstruction on abdominal CT densitometry and image quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Stiphout JA; Driessen J; Koetzier LR; Ruules LB; Willemink MJ; Heemskerk JWT; van der Molen AJ
    Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):2921-2929. PubMed ID: 34913104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation Dose Reduction for 80-kVp Pediatric CT Using Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction: A Clinical and Phantom Study.
    Nagayama Y; Goto M; Sakabe D; Emoto T; Shigematsu S; Oda S; Tanoue S; Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Funama Y; Uchimura R; Takada S; Hayashi H; Hatemura M; Hirai T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Aug; 219(2):315-324. PubMed ID: 35195431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI.
    Bae JS; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Joo I; Lee KB; Kim H
    Radiology; 2021 May; 299(2):336-345. PubMed ID: 33650901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deep learning-based reconstruction may improve non-contrast cerebral CT imaging compared to other current reconstruction algorithms.
    Oostveen LJ; Meijer FJA; de Lange F; Smit EJ; Pegge SA; Steens SCA; van Amerongen MJ; Prokop M; Sechopoulos I
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5498-5506. PubMed ID: 33693996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
    Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction and Hybrid Reconstruction Techniques for Liver CT Evaluation of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Park HJ; Lee JM; Park SB; Lee JB; Jeong YK; Yoon JH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(6):863-871. PubMed ID: 27331929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 2017 (LI-RADS) Criteria for Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kierans AS; Makkar J; Guniganti P; Cornman-Homonoff J; Lee MJ; Pittman M; Askin G; Hecht EM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e205-e215. PubMed ID: 30257054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deep learning reconstruction for 1.5 T cervical spine MRI: effect on interobserver agreement in the evaluation of degenerative changes.
    Yasaka K; Tanishima T; Ohtake Y; Tajima T; Akai H; Ohtomo K; Abe O; Kiryu S
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6118-6125. PubMed ID: 35348861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.