200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36757780)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer in China.
Zheng Z; Song X; Qiu G; Xu S; Cai H
Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 Mar; 39(3):433-440. PubMed ID: 36757780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab for treatment of US patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.
Shi Y; Chen J; Shi B; Liu A
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 164(2):379-385. PubMed ID: 34920886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pembrolizumab with or without bevacizumab for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Barrington DA; Riedinger C; Haight PJ; Tubbs C; Cohn DE
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 165(3):500-505. PubMed ID: 35422338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or More.
Zheng Z; Lin J; Zhu H; Cai H
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():893387. PubMed ID: 35774581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative cost-effectiveness of first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.
Lin YT; Wang C; He XY; Yao QM; Chen J
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1345942. PubMed ID: 38274823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score 1% or greater.
She L; Hu H; Liao M; Xia X; Shi Y; Yao L; Ding D; Zhu Y; Zeng S; Shen L; Huang J; Carbone DP
Lung Cancer; 2019 Dec; 138():88-94. PubMed ID: 31655368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic evaluation of sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for the treatment of first-line advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC.
Chen P; Wang X; Zhu S; Li H; Rui M; Wang Y; Sun H; Ma A
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():956792. PubMed ID: 36016894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in China: an economic analysis based on a randomised, open-label, phase III trial.
Xin W; Ding H; Fang Q; Zheng X; Tong Y; Xu G; Yang G
BMJ Open; 2020 Dec; 10(12):e038867. PubMed ID: 33371020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Utility Analysis of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Different PD-L1 Expression Levels.
Weng X; Luo S; Lin S; Zhong L; Li M; Xin R; Huang P; Xu X
Oncol Res; 2020 Mar; 28(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 31610828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy and chemotherapy in the non-small-cell lung cancer with different PD-L1 tumor proportion scores.
Zhou K; Jiang C; Li Q
Lung Cancer; 2019 Oct; 136():98-101. PubMed ID: 31476529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the 1st line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC in the US.
Insinga RP; Vanness DJ; Feliciano JL; Vandormael K; Traore S; Burke T
J Med Econ; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1191-1205. PubMed ID: 30188231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for mismatch-repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer from the perspective of the Chinese health-care system.
Zhu C; Han G; Wu B
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Oct; 23(1):1083. PubMed ID: 37821934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for previously untreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in the USA.
Zeng X; Wan X; Peng L; Peng Y; Ma F; Liu Q; Tan C
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e031019. PubMed ID: 31831534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer Based on the KEYNOTE-181 Study.
Zhan M; Xu T; Zheng H; He Z
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():790225. PubMed ID: 35309225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Liang X; Chen X; Li H; Liu X; Li Y
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1054405. PubMed ID: 36923040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus standard chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China.
Jiang Y; Wang X
Eur J Hosp Pharm; 2022 May; 29(3):139-144. PubMed ID: 32737070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer.
Liu T; Liu S; Guan S; Tai Y; Jin Y; Dong M
J Chemother; 2023 Dec; 35(8):745-752. PubMed ID: 36591729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer and high PD-L1 expression in Switzerland.
Barbier MC; Pardo E; Panje CM; Gautschi O; Lupatsch JE;
Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Jul; 22(5):669-677. PubMed ID: 33745093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
