These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36757985)

  • 1. Relationships between native and non-native speech perception.
    Fuhrmeister P; Phillips MC; McCoach DB; Myers EB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1161-1175. PubMed ID: 36757985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual Differences in Phonetic Plasticity Across Native and Nonnative Contexts.
    Heffner CC; Myers EB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Oct; 64(10):3720-3733. PubMed ID: 34525309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception.
    Polka L
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jul; 52(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 1635856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning words' sounds before learning how words sound: 9-month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information.
    Yeung HH; Werker JF
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19765698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of abstraction in non-native speech perception.
    Pajak B; Levy R
    J Phon; 2014 Sep; 46():147-160. PubMed ID: 25197153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distributional learning of speech sound categories is gated by sensitive periods.
    Reh RK; Hensch TK; Werker JF
    Cognition; 2021 Aug; 213():104653. PubMed ID: 33752869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical experience and categorical perception of children's speech.
    Meyer MK; Munson B
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2021 Mar; 56(2):374-388. PubMed ID: 33599080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring individual differences in native phonetic perception and their link to nonnative phonetic perception.
    Honda CT; Clayards M; Baum SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Apr; 50(4):370-394. PubMed ID: 38300566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception.
    Werker JF; Tees RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jun; 75(6):1866-78. PubMed ID: 6747097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants.
    Best CT; McRoberts GW; Sithole NM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Aug; 14(3):345-60. PubMed ID: 2971765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emergence of category-level sensitivities in non-native speech sound learning.
    Myers EB
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():238. PubMed ID: 25152708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural neural correlates of individual differences in categorical perception.
    Fuhrmeister P; Myers EB
    Brain Lang; 2021 Apr; 215():104919. PubMed ID: 33524740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain potentials to native phoneme discrimination reveal the origin of individual differences in learning the sounds of a second language.
    Díaz B; Baus C; Escera C; Costa A; Sebastián-Gallés N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Oct; 105(42):16083-8. PubMed ID: 18852470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of category learning on neural sensitivity to non-native phonetic categories.
    Myers EB; Swan K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 24(8):1695-708. PubMed ID: 22621261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Processing steps in perception of speech sounds].
    Kiener S
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(2):194-215. PubMed ID: 1413917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating automatic speech recognition systems as quantitative models of cross-lingual phonetic category perception.
    Schatz T; Bach F; Dupoux E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):EL372. PubMed ID: 29857692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain-behavior relationships in incidental learning of non-native phonetic categories.
    Luthra S; Fuhrmeister P; Molfese PJ; Guediche S; Blumstein SE; Myers EB
    Brain Lang; 2019 Nov; 198():104692. PubMed ID: 31522094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory detection of non-speech and speech stimuli in noise: Effects of listeners' native language background.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2782-90. PubMed ID: 26627754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sleep and native language interference affect non-native speech sound learning.
    Earle FS; Myers EB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1680-95. PubMed ID: 26280264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.