These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3675840)

  • 1. Operant conditioning of hippocampal theta: dissociating reward from performance deficits.
    Fantie BD; Nakajima S
    Behav Neurosci; 1987 Oct; 101(5):626-33. PubMed ID: 3675840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Behavioral and hippocampal electrical changes during operant learning in cats and effects of stimulating two hypothalamic--hippocampal systems.
    Coleman JR; Lindsley DB
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1977 Mar; 42(3):309-31. PubMed ID: 65267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: evidence for mediation by motor deficits rather than by reduced reward.
    Fibiger HC; Carter DA; Phillips AG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1976 May; 47(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 959465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between lick or lever-pressing contingent reward and the effects of neuroleptics thereon.
    Wauquier A; Niemegeers CJ
    Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther; 1979 Jun; 239(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 39532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amelioration of fornix lesion induced learning deficits by self-stimulation rewarding experience.
    Yoganarasimha D; Meti BL
    Brain Res; 1999 Oct; 845(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 10536206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Main effects of current and pimozide on prepared and learned self-stimulation behaviors are on performance not reward.
    Mekarski JE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1988 Dec; 31(4):845-53. PubMed ID: 3252276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nicotine and brain-stimulation reward: interactions with morphine, amphetamine and pimozide.
    Huston-Lyons D; Sarkar M; Kornetsky C
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1993 Oct; 46(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 8265701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preference paradigm: provides better self-stimulation reward discrimination than a rate-dependent paradigm.
    Mason PA; Milner PM; Miousse R
    Behav Neural Biol; 1985 Nov; 44(3):521-9. PubMed ID: 4084194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential effects of drug treatments on nose-poke and bar-press self-stimulation.
    Gerhardt S; Liebman JM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Nov; 15(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 7312912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The curve-shift paradigm in self-stimulation.
    Miliaressis E; Rompre PP; Laviolette P; Philippe L; Coulombe D
    Physiol Behav; 1986; 37(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 3016774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit.
    Franklin KB; McCoy SN
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Jul; 11(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 493299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuroleptic-induced attenuation of brain stimulation reward in rats.
    Fouriezos G; Hansson P; Wise RA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1978 Aug; 92(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 29060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simultaneous rate-independent and rate-dependent assessment of intracranial self-stimulation: evidence for the direct involvement of dopamine in brain reinforcement mechanisms.
    Zarevics P; Setler PE
    Brain Res; 1979 Jun; 169(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 312681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rewarding and aversive properties of electrical stimulation in the dorsal and ventral regions of the lateral hypothalamus in the mouse.
    Cazala
    Behav Neural Biol; 1979 Feb; 25(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 464971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discriminating between reward and performance: a critical review of intracranial self-stimulation methodology.
    Liebman JM
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 1983; 7(1):45-72. PubMed ID: 6132357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual cues of reinforcing brain stimulations in the postero-lateral area of the hypothalamus.
    De Witte P
    Physiol Behav; 1982 Mar; 28(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 7079360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dopaminergic and noradrenergic inhibition of hypothalamic self-stimulation: differentiation of reward and performance effects.
    Sinden JD; Atrens DM
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1982 Dec; 86(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 7160436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of gonadal steroids on brain stimulation reward in female rats.
    Bless EP; McGinnis KA; Mitchell AL; Hartwell A; Mitchell JB
    Behav Brain Res; 1997 Jan; 82(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 9030405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reward summation and the effects of pimozide, clonidine, and amphetamine on fixed-interval responding for brain stimulation.
    Hunt GE; Atrens DM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Aug; 42(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 1513839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance effects with repeated-response measures during pimozide-produced dopamine receptor blockade.
    Ettenberg A; Cinsavich SA; White N
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Nov; 11(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 531078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.