193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36758961)
1. Prevalence and methodological quality of systematic reviews in Korean medical journals.
Kim SJ; Han MA; Jung JH; Hwang EC; Kim HR; Yoon SE; Kim SH; Kim P; Kim SY
Epidemiol Health; 2023; 45():e2023017. PubMed ID: 36758961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
Ho L; Ke FYT; Wong CHL; Wu IXY; Cheung AKL; Mao C; Chung VCH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):237. PubMed ID: 34717563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Feng T; Wang X; Jin Z; Qin X; Sun C; Qi B; Zhang Y; Zhu L; Wei X
Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1081238. PubMed ID: 36908468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals.
Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM
Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.
Martinez-Monedero R; Danielian A; Angajala V; Dinalo JE; Kezirian EJ
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Nov; 163(5):892-905. PubMed ID: 32450783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews on Bodyweight Management Strategies for Children and Adolescents.
Ho RS; Chui KY; Huang WY; Wong SH
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2023 May; 55(5):892-899. PubMed ID: 36728305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Most systematic reviews reporting adherence to AMSTAR 2 had critically low methodological quality: a cross-sectional meta-research study.
Bojcic R; Todoric M; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 165():111210. PubMed ID: 37931822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals.
Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Innes NP
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Nov; 28(6):548-560. PubMed ID: 30070003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey.
Cheung AKL; Wong CHL; Ho L; Wu IXY; Ke FYT; Chung VCH
BMC Complement Med Ther; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35197038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals.
Dettori JR; Skelly AC; Brodt ED
Global Spine J; 2020 Aug; 10(5):667-673. PubMed ID: 32677574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Saudi journals from 1997 to 2017.
Natto ZS; AlGhamdi DS
Saudi Med J; 2019 May; 40(5):426-431. PubMed ID: 31056617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
