These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36760919)

  • 1. Comparison of IOP obtained in different kind of eyes with contact and no contact tonometers.
    Sbordone S; Ragucci A; Iaccarino G; Scognamiglio G; Leone A; Carnevale UAG; Lanza M
    Oman J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 36760919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular pressure evaluation in healthy eyes and diseased ones using contact and non contact devices.
    Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Mele L; Carnevale UA; Irregolare C; Lanza A; Femiano F; Bifani M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Apr; 39(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 26481062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating Intraocular Pressure After Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Comparison of Different Tonometers.
    Lanza M; Sbordone S; Tortori A; Gironi Carnevale UA; Melillo P; Simonelli F
    J Glaucoma; 2022 Jun; 31(6):406-412. PubMed ID: 35394466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of differences in intraocular pressure evaluation performed with contact and non-contact devices.
    Lanza M; Rinaldi M; Carnevale UAG; di Staso S; Sconocchia MB; Costagliola C
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):233. PubMed ID: 30176825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between Corvis and other tonometers in healthy eyes.
    Lanza M; Iaccarino S; Cennamo M; Irregolare C; Romano V; Carnevale UA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Apr; 38(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 25467287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST.
    Ramm L; Herber R; Spoerl E; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Terai N
    J Ophthalmol; 2019; 2019():3879651. PubMed ID: 31737355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals.
    Ouyang PB; Li CY; Zhu XH; Duan XC
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 22553765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison among Ocular Response Analyzer, Corvis ST and Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy children.
    Salouti R; Alishiri AA; Gharebaghi R; Naderi M; Jadidi K; Shojaei-Baghini A; Talebnejad M; Nasiri Z; Hosseini S; Heidary F
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2018; 11(8):1330-1336. PubMed ID: 30140637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy.
    Sadigh AL; Fouladi RF; Hashemi H; Beheshtnejad AH
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 251(2):603-8. PubMed ID: 22940796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
    Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of current tonometry techniques in measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Kouchaki B; Hashemi H; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 29(2):92-97. PubMed ID: 28626817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP.
    Yoo C; Eom YS; Kim YY
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 248(11):1611-6. PubMed ID: 20652303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour, Goldmann applanation, and noncontact tonometry.
    Oncel B; Dinc U; Orge F; Yalvac B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(6):936-41. PubMed ID: 19882585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.
    Zhang Y; Zheng L; Bian A; Zhou Q
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 28444523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison between Goldmann, Icare Pro and Corvis ST tonometry].
    Bañeros-Rojas P; Martinez de la Casa JM; Arribas-Pardo P; Berrozpe-Villabona C; Toro-Utrera P; García-Feijoó J
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2014 Jul; 89(7):260-4. PubMed ID: 24814401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
    Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.