These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36761717)

  • 1. The Manifestation of Incidental Findings in Different Experimental Visual Search Paradigms.
    Rubtsova OS; Gorbunova ES
    Psychol Russ; 2022; 15(4):140-158. PubMed ID: 36761717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of categorical superiority in subsequent search misses.
    Rubtsova O; Gorbunova ES
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Sep; 219():103375. PubMed ID: 34333278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How did I miss that? Developing mixed hybrid visual search as a 'model system' for incidental finding errors in radiology.
    Wolfe JM; Alaoui Soce A; Schill HM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2017; 2(1):35. PubMed ID: 28890920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual search errors are persistent in a laboratory analog of the incidental finding problem.
    Nartker MS; Alaoui-Soce A; Wolfe JM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Jul; 5(1):32. PubMed ID: 32728864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search.
    Williams CC; Henderson JM; Zacks RT
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):816-27. PubMed ID: 16334054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.
    Walenchok SC; Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2633-2654. PubMed ID: 27531018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual similarity in visual search for multiple targets.
    Gorbunova ES
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Feb; 173():46-54. PubMed ID: 28002721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The detail is in the difficulty: Challenging search facilitates rich incidental object encoding.
    Guevara Pinto JD; Papesh MH; Hout MC
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1214-1233. PubMed ID: 32562249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual similarity effects in categorical search.
    Alexander RG; Zelinsky GJ
    J Vis; 2011 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 21757505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Satisfaction in motion: Subsequent search misses are more likely in moving search displays.
    Stothart C; Clement A; Brockmole JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):409-415. PubMed ID: 28484947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning in repeated visual search.
    Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1267-82. PubMed ID: 20601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
    Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The attentional template in high and low similarity search: Optimal tuning or tuning to relations?
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104732. PubMed ID: 33862440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the Attentional Boost Effect Depend on the Intentionality of Encoding? Investigating the Mechanisms Underlying Memory for Visual Objects Presented at Behaviorally Relevant Moments in Time.
    Hutmacher F; Kuhbandner C
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():584187. PubMed ID: 33304298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidental memory following rapid object processing: The role of attention allocation strategies.
    Guevara Pinto JD; Papesh MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1174-1190. PubMed ID: 31219283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual search in virtual 3D space: the relation of multiple targets and distractors.
    Plewan T; Rinkenauer G
    Psychol Res; 2021 Sep; 85(6):2151-2162. PubMed ID: 33388993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast responses to neglected targets in visual search reflect pre-attentive processes: an exploration of response times in visual neglect.
    Laeng B; Brennen T; Espeseth T
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(9):1622-36. PubMed ID: 11985844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The time course of categorical and perceptual similarity effects in visual search.
    Yeh LC; Peelen MV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1069-1082. PubMed ID: 35951407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of object categories in hybrid visual and memory search.
    Cunningham CA; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1585-99. PubMed ID: 24661054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failures of perception in the low-prevalence effect: Evidence from active and passive visual search.
    Hout MC; Walenchok SC; Goldinger SD; Wolfe JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):977-94. PubMed ID: 25915073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.