These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36761717)
21. No Effect of the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex tDCS in Dual-Target Visual Search. Lanina AA; Feurra M; Gorbunova ES Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2112. PubMed ID: 30483172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Object-scene relationships vary the magnitude of target prevalence effects in visual search. Beanland V; Le RK; Byrne JE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):766-75. PubMed ID: 26618623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Motion disrupts dynamic visual search for an orientation change. Crowe EM; Howard CJ; Gilchrist ID; Kent C Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Jun; 6(1):47. PubMed ID: 34175977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Individual differences in selective attention and scanning dynamics influence children's learning from relevant non-targets in a visual search task. King J; Markant J J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 May; 193():104797. PubMed ID: 31991262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Running the figure to the ground: figure-ground segmentation during visual search. Ralph BC; Seli P; Cheng VO; Solman GJ; Smilek D Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():65-73. PubMed ID: 24582768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback. Cox PH; Kravitz DJ; Mitroff SR Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 33740159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses. Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Self-induced attentional blink: a cause of errors in multiple-target search. Adamo SH; Cain MS; Mitroff SR Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2569-74. PubMed ID: 24142814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Order, please! Explicit sequence learning in hybrid search in younger and older age. Wiegand I; Westenberg E; Wolfe JM Mem Cognit; 2021 Aug; 49(6):1220-1235. PubMed ID: 33876402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets. Thomas MD; Williams CC Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. You see what you look for: Targets and distractors in visual search can cause opposing serial dependencies. Rafiei M; Chetverikov A; Hansmann-Roth S; Kristjánsson Á J Vis; 2021 Sep; 21(10):3. PubMed ID: 34468704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Role of Color in Search Templates for Real-world Target Objects. Nako R; Smith TJ; Eimer M J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 28(11):1714-1727. PubMed ID: 27315273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements. Hout MC; Goldinger SD J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):90-112. PubMed ID: 21574743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Target detection and discrimination in pop-out visual search with two targets. Wilmott JP; Makwana M; Song JH Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1538-1552. PubMed ID: 35505066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Role of Working Memory in Dual-Target Visual Search. Gorbunova ES; Kozlov KS; Le STT; Makarov IM Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1673. PubMed ID: 31417449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]