These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36762495)

  • 1. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of conventional impressions and digital scans for implant-supported fixed prostheses in maxillary free-ended partial edentulism: An in vitro study.
    El Osta N; Drancourt N; Auduc C; Veyrune JL; Nicolas E
    J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104892. PubMed ID: 38367825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners.
    Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment scan body system scans at different sites of maxilla after multiple repositioning of the scan body.
    Donmez MB; Güven ME; Yılmaz D; Abou-Ayash S; Çakmak G; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104716. PubMed ID: 37739057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of supramucosal height of a scan body and implant angulation on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: An in vitro study.
    Sicilia E; Lagreca G; Papaspyridakos P; Finkelman M; Cobo J; Att W; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1126-1134. PubMed ID: 36828728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of auxiliary geometric devices on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro study.
    Canullo L; Pesce P; Caponio VCA; Iacono R; Luciani FS; Raffone C; Menini M
    J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():104979. PubMed ID: 38556193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of edentulous full-arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry.
    Cheng J; Zhang H; Liu H; Li J; Wang HL; Tao X
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 May; 35(5):560-572. PubMed ID: 38421115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of different complete coverage onlay preparation designs and the intraoral scanner on the accuracy of digital scans.
    de Andrade GS; Luz JN; Tribst JPM; Chun EP; Bressane A; Borges ALS; Saavedra GSFA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1168-1177. PubMed ID: 35717209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of different impression coping and scan body designs on the accuracy of conventional versus digital implant impressions: An in vitro study.
    Alkindi S; Hamdoon Z; Aziz AM
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105045. PubMed ID: 38714241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of intraoral scanner, scanning strategy, and scanned arch on the scan accuracy of edentulous arches: An in vitro study.
    Jamjoom FZ; Aldghim A; Aldibasi O; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 36841708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel post-processing strategy to improve the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scanning for implants: an in vitro study.
    Pan Y; Dai X; Wan F; Song C; Tsoi JK; Pow EH
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104761. PubMed ID: 37879557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Different Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Bite Registration in Edentulous Maxillary and Mandibular Arches.
    Rutkūnas V; Jegelevičius D; Gedrimienė A; Auškalnis L; Eyüboğlu TF; Özcan M; Husain NA; Akulauskas M; Pletkus J
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105050. PubMed ID: 38735468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparison of accuracy between conventional and digital impression using elastomeric materials and two intra-oral scanning devices.
    Palantza E; Sykaras N; Zoidis P; Kourtis S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Aug; 36(8):1179-1198. PubMed ID: 38534043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of the superimposition reference area on intraoral scanning accuracy in a partially dentate maxilla.
    Negm EE; Patel M; Ryan P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):189.e1-189.e11. PubMed ID: 38556406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of implant scan body geometric modifications on the trueness and scanning time of complete arch intraoral implant digital scans: An in vitro study.
    Lawand G; Ismail Y; Revilla-León M; Tohme H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1189-1197. PubMed ID: 35864021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of different surface locking patterns on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans: An in vitro study.
    Kondakji E; Lawand G; Yaacoub W; Tohme H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38918157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of scanning distance on the accuracy of a photogrammetry system.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Drone M; Barmak AB; Guinot-Barona C; Att W; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104854. PubMed ID: 38246309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the Number of Scan Bodies on Full-Arch Implant Scanning: A Comparison of 2 vs 4 Implants.
    Abdelrehim A; Salleh NM; Sofian H; Sulaiman E
    J Oral Implantol; 2024 Apr; 50(2):104-110. PubMed ID: 38353347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study.
    Mangano FG; Admakin O; Bonacina M; Lerner H; Rutkunas V; Mangano C
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):263. PubMed ID: 32962680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.