These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36763830)
1. A Critical Analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Diameter Threshold for Adverse Pathology Features. Danacioglu YO; Turkay R; Yildiz O; Polat S; Arikan Y; Polat H; Yenice MG; Baytekin HF; Inci E; Tasci Aİ Prague Med Rep; 2023; 124(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 36763830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can Extraprostatic Extension Be Predicted by Tumor-Capsule Contact Length in Prostate Cancer? Relationship With International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups. Bakir B; Onay A; Vural M; Armutlu A; Yıldız SÖ; Esen T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):588-596. PubMed ID: 31670596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen. Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure. Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeat MRI during active surveillance: natural history of prostatic lesions and upgrading rates. Luzzago S; Piccinelli ML; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Di Trapani E; Cioffi A; Catellani M; Fontana M; Jannello LMI; Botticelli FMG; Marvaso G; Alessi S; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Fusco N; Petralia G; de Cobelli O; Musi G BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):524-533. PubMed ID: 34687137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol. Luzzago S; Musi G; Catellani M; Russo A; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Conti A; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Mirone V; Petralia G; de Cobelli O Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 29734177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned? Tan WP; Mazzone A; Shors S; Antoine N; Ekbal S; Khare N; McKiel C; Pessis D; Deane L Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e7-31.e12. PubMed ID: 27692837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Extraprostatic Disease-A Risk Model for Patient-tailored Risk Stratification When Planning Radical Prostatectomy. Nyarangi-Dix J; Wiesenfarth M; Bonekamp D; Hitthaler B; Schütz V; Dieffenbacher S; Mueller-Wolf M; Roth W; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Roethke M; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Nov; 6(6):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 30477971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suboptimal Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens by mpMRI-Targeted Biopsy. Karsiyakali N; Ozgen MB; Ozveren B; Akbal C; Dincer A; Durak H; Turkeri L Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():217-223. PubMed ID: 32871139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in defining prostate cancer anterior lesions. Porreca A; Bianchi FM; Salvaggio A; D'Agostino D; Del Rosso A; Romagnoli D; Corsi P; Colicchia M; Barbaresi U; Bianchi L; Giampaoli M; Schiavina R; Palmer K; Del Giudice F; Maggi M; Ferro M; Sciarra A; De Berardinis E; Busetto GM World J Urol; 2021 May; 39(5):1473-1479. PubMed ID: 32621027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer. Boesen L Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lesion location agreement between prostatic multiparametric magnetic resonance, cognitive fusion biopsy and radical prostatectomy piece. Lourenço M; Pissarra P; E Brito DV; Eliseu M; Peralta JP; Figueiredo A; Marques C Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Jan; 91(4):218-223. PubMed ID: 31937086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI lesion size is more important than the number of positive biopsy cores in predicting adverse features and recurrence after radical prostatectomy: implications for active surveillance criteria in intermediate-risk patients. Baboudjian M; Uleri A; Beauval JB; Touzani A; Diamand R; Roche JB; Lacetera V; Lechevallier E; Roumeguère T; Simone G; Benamran D; Fourcade A; Fiard G; Peltier A; Ploussard G Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 Jun; 27(2):318-322. PubMed ID: 37452146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of Sampling PI-RADS 4-5 Index Lesions Alone by MRI-guided In-bore Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. Kilic M; Vural M; Coskun B; Acar Ö; Saglican Y; Akpek S; Esen T Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 31054811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk model based on MRI fusion biopsy characteristics predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Chen Z; Wu J; Sun K; He Y; Zhu Z; Xiao L; Sheng L Prostate; 2022 Apr; 82(5):566-575. PubMed ID: 35067945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI grading for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness. Boschheidgen M; Schimmöller L; Arsov C; Ziayee F; Morawitz J; Valentin B; Radke KL; Giessing M; Esposito I; Albers P; Antoch G; Ullrich T Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 34748064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy. Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings. Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]