These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36763830)

  • 21. Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?
    Hoffmann R; Logan C; O'Callaghan M; Gormly K; Chan K; Foreman D
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29188489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study.
    Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Krelle M; Gavin D; Koschel S; Aluwihare K; Sutherland T; Skinner S; Brennan J; Wong LM; Louie-Johnsun M
    BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 30714285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
    Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.
    Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H
    BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictive clinical features for negative histopathology of MRI/Ultrasound-fusion-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high likelihood of cancer at prostate MRI: Analysis from a urologic outpatient clinic1.
    Apfelbeck M; Pfitzinger P; Bischoff R; Rath L; Buchner A; Mumm JN; Schlenker B; Stief CG; Chaloupka M; Clevert DA
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 76(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 33337358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Minimum Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Cores Needed for Prostate Cancer Detection: Multivariable Retrospective, Lesion Based Analyses of Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Tian Z; Karakiewicz PI; Tilki D; Fisch M; Maurer T; Graefen M; Budäus L
    J Urol; 2020 Feb; 203(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 31483694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Correlation analysis between prostate imaging report and data system score and pathological results of prostate cancer].
    Zhu LY; Ding XF; Huang TB; Luan Y; Guo CH; Xu YZ; Wang F
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 100(34):2663-2668. PubMed ID: 32921014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chaloupka M; Bischoff R; Pfitzinger P; Lellig E; Ledderose S; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Stief C; Clevert DA; Apfelbeck M
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31561351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate underestimates tumour volume of small visible lesions.
    Sorce G; Stabile A; Lucianò R; Motterle G; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Pellegrino F; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Jeffrey Karnes R; Guccini I; Briganti A
    BJU Int; 2022 Feb; 129(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 34038039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) results with the final pathology findings for radical prostatectomy specimens in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Lee CH; Ku JY; Park WY; Lee NK; Ha HK
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2019 Apr; 15(2):e20-e27. PubMed ID: 29920966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
    Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
    BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combining prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging may better predict extraprostatic extension after radical prostatectomy.
    Huang YP; Lin TP; Shen SH; Cheng WM; Huang TH; Huang IS; Fan YH; Lin CC; Huang EYH; Chung HJ; Lu SH; Chang YH; Lin ATL; Huang WJ
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2023 Jan; 86(1):52-56. PubMed ID: 36346752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of prostate multiparametric MRI for prediction of prostate cancer extra-prostatic extension according to NCCN risk categories: implication for surgical planning.
    Falagario UG; Jambor I; Ratnani P; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Wajswol E; Lantz A; Papastefanou G; Weil R; Phillip D; Lewis S; Haines K; Cormio L; Carrieri G; Kyprianou N; Wiklund P; Tewari AK
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Dec; 72(6):746-754. PubMed ID: 32182231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
    Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
    World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion-assisted biopsy for the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Muller BG; Kaushal A; Sankineni S; Lita E; Hoang AN; George AK; Rais-Bahrami S; Kruecker J; Yan P; Xu S; de la Rosette JJ; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Oct; 33(10):425.e1-425.e6. PubMed ID: 26259666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The visibility of prostate cancer concerning underlying histopathological variances: A single-center multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Arslan A; Alis D; Tuna MB; Sağlıcan Y; Kural AR; Karaarslan E
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109791. PubMed ID: 34062471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Extent of High-Grade Prostatic Adenocarcinoma in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy Enhances Prediction of Pathologic Stage.
    Paulson N; Vollmer RT; Humphrey PA; Sprenkle PC; Onofrey J; Huber S; Amirkhiz K; Levi AW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Jan; 146(2):201-204. PubMed ID: 34015819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect significant prostate cancer and index lesion location.
    Goldman H; Singh N; Harding C; McGirr J; Seal A; Duncan I; Sowter S
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 Jan; 89(1-2):106-110. PubMed ID: 30257273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging finding does not guarantee the absence of significant cancer among biopsy-proven prostate cancer patients: a real-life clinical experience.
    Kim JJ; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee HJ; Choe G; Hong SK
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Nov; 50(11):1989-1997. PubMed ID: 30229465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.