119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36764458)
1. Patient anatomy-specific trade-offs between sub-clinical disease coverage and normal tissue dose reduction in head-and-neck cancer.
Kaplan LP; Holm AIS; Eriksen JG; Heijmen BJM; Korreman SS; Rossi L
Radiother Oncol; 2023 May; 182():109526. PubMed ID: 36764458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric Evaluation of Incorporating Patient Geometric Variations Into Adaptive Plan Optimization Through Probabilistic Treatment Planning in Head and Neck Cancers.
Liu Q; Liang J; Zhou D; Krauss DJ; Chen PY; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jul; 101(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 29976511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of Multi-Criteria Optimization-based Trade-Off exploration in combination with RapidPlan for head & neck radiotherapy planning.
Miguel-Chumacero E; Currie G; Johnston A; Currie S
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Nov; 13(1):229. PubMed ID: 30470254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Dosimetric Gains Provided by Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volume-Modulated Arc Therapy, and Helical Tomotherapy for High-Grade Glioma.
Liu P; Liu G; Wang G; Zhou W; Sun Y; Chen W; Zeng Q; Hong J; Xie Q; Ou L; Wei R
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():4258989. PubMed ID: 32258121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning.
Ahmed S; Nelms B; Gintz D; Caudell J; Zhang G; Moros EG; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5486-5497. PubMed ID: 28777469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved VMAT planning for head and neck tumors with an advanced optimization algorithm.
Klippel N; Schmücking M; Terribilini D; Geretschläger A; Aebersold DM; Manser P
Z Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 25(4):333-340. PubMed ID: 26071076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative plan robustness of step-and-shoot vs rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy on repeat computed tomographic simulation for weight loss in head and neck cancer.
Thomson DJ; Beasley WJ; Garcez K; Lee LW; Sykes AJ; Rowbottom CG; Slevin NJ
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 26993081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward optimal organ at risk sparing in complex volumetric modulated arc therapy: an exponential trade-off with target volume dose homogeneity.
Tol JP; Dahele M; Doornaert P; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021722. PubMed ID: 24506613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Agolli L; Rehm M; Richter C; Stützer K
Br J Radiol; 2020 Mar; 93(1107):20190573. PubMed ID: 31778315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intensity modulated radiotherapy improves target coverage and parotid gland sparing when delivering total mucosal irradiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck of unknown primary site.
Bhide S; Clark C; Harrington K; Nutting CM
Med Dosim; 2007; 32(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 17707198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparison of volumetric-arc therapy versus sliding window intensity-modulated radiotherapy in postoperative treatment for primary soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh.
Ortiz González I; Morera Cano D; Roncero Sánchez R; Mateos Salvador P; Valencia Blanco L; Vidal Borrás M; Aymar Salís N; Gadea Quinteiro J; Jiménez Jiménez E; Gelabert JF; Pardo Masferrer J
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):371-376. PubMed ID: 31321885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy, Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Angiosarcoma of the Scalp.
Mizuno T; Tomita N; Takaoka T; Tomida M; Fukuma H; Tsuchiya T; Shibamoto Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():1533033820985866. PubMed ID: 33517860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative treatment planning study on sequential vs. simultaneous integrated boost in head and neck cancer patients: Differences in dose distributions and potential implications for clinical practice.
Stromberger C; Ghadjar P; Marnitz S; Thieme AH; Jahn U; Raguse JD; Karaj-Rossbacher E; Böttcher A; Jamil B; Budach V
Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Jan; 192(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 26462675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Partitioning of discrete proton arcs into interlaced subplans can bring proton arc advances to existing proton facilities.
Engwall E; Marthin O; Wase V; Sundström J; Mikhalev V; de Jong BA; Langendijk JA; Melbéus H; Andersson B; Korevaar EW; Both S; Bokrantz R; Glimelius L; Fredriksson A
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5723-5733. PubMed ID: 37482909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
