These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3676529)

  • 1. Patient warnings in court-ordered evaluations of children and families.
    Barnum R; Silverberg J; Nied D
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(3):283-300. PubMed ID: 3676529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practice parameter for child and adolescent forensic evaluations.
    Kraus LJ; Thomas CR; Bukstein OG; Walter HJ; Benson RS; Chrisman A; Farchione TR; Hamilton J; Keable H; Kinlan J; Schoettle U; Siegel M; Stock S; Ptakowski KK; Medicus J
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2011 Dec; 50(12):1299-312. PubMed ID: 22115153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attorney work product privilege trumps mandated child abuse reporting law: The case of Elijah W. v. Superior Court.
    Lareau CR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():43-8. PubMed ID: 26404507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Truth and confidentiality at the bedside. Legal evaluation].
    Laum HD
    Zentralbl Chir; 2000; 125(11):920-5. PubMed ID: 11143519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Waiver of the psychotherapist-patient privilege: implications for child custody litigation.
    Boumil MM; Freitas DF; Freitas CF
    Health Matrix Clevel; 2012; 22(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 22616541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal rights of children.
    Horowitz R
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2002 Oct; 11(4):705-17. PubMed ID: 12397894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [On the work of Austrian authorised experts on procedures in custodial and visiting rights--a survey of current practice from the parents and children view].
    Vöelkl-Kernstock S; Bein N; Gutschner D; Klicpera C; Ponocny-Seliger E; Friedrich MH
    Neuropsychiatr; 2008; 22(4):268-76. PubMed ID: 19080998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accessibility to a parent's psychotherapy records in custody disputes: how can the competing interests be balanced?
    Stansbury CD
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(4):522-41. PubMed ID: 20648534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Independent and court-ordered forensic neuropsychological examinations: official statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology.
    Bush SS;
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Dec; 20(8):997-1007. PubMed ID: 16076547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adolescent separation-individuation and the court.
    Eth S
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 6640117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HIV testing. Informed consent and confidentiality.
    Allen WL
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Jan; 81(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 8133233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic assessment of juvenile delinquents: prevalence of psychopathology and decision-making at court in the netherlands.
    Doreleijers TA; Moser F; Thijs P; van Engeland H; Beyaert FH
    J Adolesc; 2000 Jun; 23(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 10837106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Competency to stand trial in family court: characteristics of competent and incompetent juveniles.
    McKee GR; Shea SJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 10212027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal psychiatry and criminal justice: the court clinic in Massachusetts.
    Wolf J
    J Forensic Sci; 1967 Apr; 12(2):147-71. PubMed ID: 6034027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The future of the juvenile court: a theoretical framework that fits.
    Moore MH
    Future Child; 1996; 6(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 9117360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legal issues surround testing, confidentiality, disclosure.
    Murphy G
    Fac Notes (New Orleans La); 1998; 10(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 11365546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The dangerous patient exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege: the Tarasoff duty and the Jaffee footnote.
    Harris GC
    Wash Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 74(1):33-68. PubMed ID: 11865923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noncompliance with family court mandated evaluations in a juvenile justice clinic.
    Kaplan G; Pannullo D; Brodzinsky D; Hitt JC
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 8193386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Massachusetts and Scotland: from juvenile justice to child welfare?
    McGhee J; Alice L; Waterhouse M
    Child Welfare; 2012; 91(5):169-91. PubMed ID: 24205555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.