These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36766897)

  • 1. Best-Worst Scaling Survey of Inpatients' Preferences in Medical Decision-Making Participation in China.
    Sun T; Chen H; Gao Y; Xiang Y; Wang F; Ni Z; Wang X; Huang X
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Jan; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 36766897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A best-worst scaling survey of medical students' perspective on implementing shared decision-making in China.
    Xu RH; Zhou L; Wong EL; Wang D; Xiang GC; Xu C
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Dec; 20(1):486. PubMed ID: 33267806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating Individuals' Preferences in Determining the Functions of Smartphone Apps for Fighting Pandemics: Best-Worst Scaling Survey Study.
    Xu RH; Shi L; Shi Z; Li T; Wang D
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e48308. PubMed ID: 37581916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
    Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing patient information needs for new antidiabetic medications to inform shared decision-making: A best-worst scaling experiment in China.
    Xie T; Meng J; Feng Z; Gao Y; Chen T; Chen Y; Geng J
    Health Expect; 2024 Jun; 27(3):e14059. PubMed ID: 38689509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
    Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Inpatients' opinion on quality of health care].
    Brogiene D; Gurevicius R
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2009; 45(3):226-37. PubMed ID: 19357453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating Medical Student's Preferences for Internet-Based Healthcare Services: A Best-Worst Scaling Survey.
    Xu RH; Zhou LM; Wong EL; Wang D
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():757310. PubMed ID: 34938703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physicians' participatory decision-making and quality of diabetes care processes and outcomes: results from the triad study.
    Heisler M; Tierney E; Ackermann RT; Tseng C; Narayan KM; Crosson J; Waitzfelder B; Safford MM; Duru K; Herman WH; Kim C
    Chronic Illn; 2009 Sep; 5(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 19675116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Participation preferences of health service users in health care decision-making regarding rehabilitative care in Germany-A cross-sectional study.
    Baumann LA; Brütt AL
    Health Expect; 2022 Feb; 25(1):125-137. PubMed ID: 34519382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inpatient satisfaction with medical information received from caregivers: an observational study on the effect of social deprivation.
    Moret L; Anthoine E; Pourreau A; Beaudeau F; Leclère B
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Nov; 17(1):769. PubMed ID: 29169348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shared decision making, physicians' explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.
    Nakayama K; Osaka W; Matsubara N; Takeuchi T; Toyoda M; Ohtake N; Uemura H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Dec; 20(1):334. PubMed ID: 33317523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?
    Chawla N; Arora NK
    J Cancer Surviv; 2013 Dec; 7(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 23892559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.
    Mühlbacher AC; Kaczynski A; Zweifel P; Johnson FR
    Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):2. PubMed ID: 26743636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making.
    McGuire AL; McCullough LB; Weller SC; Whitney SN
    Med Care; 2005 May; 43(5):466-70. PubMed ID: 15838411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient preferences versus physicians' judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making?
    Mühlbacher AC; Juhnke C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Jun; 11(3):163-80. PubMed ID: 23529716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Physician perspectives on the impact of patient preferences and the role of next-of-kin of patients in evidence-based decision-making: A qualitative interview study from oncology].
    Salloch S; Otte IC; Reinacher-Schick A; Vollmann J
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():46-52. PubMed ID: 29544714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does it matter whether physicians' recommendations are given early or late in the decision-making process? An experimental study among patients with schizophrenia.
    Hamann J; Kissling W; Mendel R
    BMJ Open; 2016 Sep; 6(9):e011282. PubMed ID: 27638491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.